this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
469 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3947 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Legal experts skewered Alina Habba's "comedy of bumbling errors" in Trump defamation trial

Former President Donald Trump's appeal of the $83.3 million verdict in the defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll is unlikely to succeed, legal experts say.

"Let me ruin the suspense for everyone. Trump doesn't have an appeal," Nashville lawyer Brian Manookian argued Friday. "I know the talking heads on TV who have never tried a case or appealed a jury verdict have to mention it. Here's why it isn't going to fly."

A person must "preserve a reversible error at the trial level" in order to have a case with merit on appeal, Manookian explained, ultimately blaming Trump's lack thereof on his legal team in the case.

"This is why you hire competent counsel. You need someone who actually knows the rules of evidence and procedure," he said. "Alina Habba had no clue what was occurring throughout the trial. She not only failed to preserve any remote grounds for appeal, like a moron, she repeatedly and unintentionally waived them over and over."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Didn’t she have a gaming laptop computer at the beginning of the trial in court? Game on!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And it wasn’t even hers. The gaming laptop belonged to the court and was used for the live transcript feed.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have a hard time believing that to be honest

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I'm surprised how noteworthy people find this

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Because it's funny either way.

Is she a legitimate attorney who is also a gamer and uses the same laptop for work so she can squeeze in some Rocket League during court recesses?

Or is she technologically incompetent, and bought an expensive laptop she didn't realize was the wrong tool for the job? She's proven she's incompetent as a lawyer, being unsavvy with tech is just icing on that cake.

Or maybe it's her nephew's gaming rig, and she's borrowing it for her big court case.

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A gaming laptop is very capable for her work. It just doesn’t look professional for said work.

“360-noscopes” trough the courtroom.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 9 months ago

I truly hope the announcer for Unreal Tournament would narrate that.

"POOR LEGAL ARGUMENT", "DENIED", "CONTEMPT OF COURT". I get shivers thinking of that.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

its like Joe Pesci's suit in my cousin vinny. like she had some misadventures in a net cafe.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I can imagine a panicked conversation at the nearest Walmart, "I was the only one without a laptop, and I need one, and it just needs to be able to handle whatever."

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Is it still funny if it turns out to be the court’s laptop used for the live transcription feed? Because that’s what she claimed on Xitter.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it's still a little funny, but at the expense of the court.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Given the rest of the horseshit she's slung since she got hired away from working parking ticket cases, I'm inclined not to believe this.

But yes, that would also be quite funny.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

I'm sure she just asked IT for the most powerful laptop she could get, and IT just shrugged and got out the corporate card. Or she games in her time off. Who knows, who cares.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It just doesn't look professional. You don't need a big GPU and RGB lights to open a web browser and PDF files.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] toastus@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Why though?

I am sure a proper gaming laptop can do anything a lawyer needs it to do.

Overspecced and overpriced for its job?
Probably, but whatever? Noone would have batted an eye if she turned up with an equally expensive Apple product.

Edit: And I am not arguing that she is an idiot or that I have tremendous Schadenfreude towards both her and Trump.
I just don't get why a gaming laptop is a bad thing to use.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I just don’t get why a gaming laptop is a bad thing to use.

RGB lights and tacticool styling are distracting and unprofessional in court, maybe.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There's nothing wrong with the laptop itself. But it doesn't really belong in that context.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

Male lawyers still wear carefully tailored business suits even when the rest of the business world has gone more casual. Female lawyers likewise tend to wear a higher level of business attire than typical in other office environments.

Language is also more formal; I had jury duty once, and the defense lawyer mentioned his client by first name. The judge reminded him that they address people formally by last name in court. (That guy came off like a relatively new lawyer working his way up in the public defender system; Trump would probably be better off hiring him than anybody he's actually getting, but that guy is also probably smart enough not to.)

How lawyers present themselves in court and in front of clients is very important. A gaming laptop with unicorn puke RGB is not a good look.

[–] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I dunno.. RGB and underglow lights cycling between orange and blue looks pretty amazing.