This is a real article, lol
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
298 points (98.7% liked)
GenZedong
4306 readers
51 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hey Global Network, you know you can just send me a DM and I'll explain everything you want to know? Why does nobody ever do that? Is this how 'research' is conducted nowadays?
It's wild how liberal journos do all those ethnographic interviews of fascist groups but don't seem to do the same for communists nearly as often.
You're right, they go out there and meet incels and fascists and try to dress the portrait of the "misunderstood kid", meanwhile we get reduced to a congealed mass that exists solely on the computer screen (but is somehow still very dangerous)
I can't say it would be a good use of your time (arguably, it would be actively detrimental to us all) but you probably could get a response if you reached out to the people who did this paper, if you were interested.
We should instead publish our own response paper accusing them of being tankies. That's a thing academics do, right? Like diss tracks?
Yeah, a "Poverty of Philosophy" type beat, except they have given us so little to work with that it would be difficult to make anything substantial.
Major “The Incoherence of the Incoherence” vibes