0
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)
GenZedong
4287 readers
63 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Probably one of the best politicians that could come out of that country. He's a prime example of using power to benefit the poor, and being accused of being "authoritarian" because he went outside of traditional norms of bourgeois-democracy to do it. In a really good Ken Burns documentary about him, his son states that his opponents criticized him of abusing the "forms" of democracy, when Long cared about the facts of democracy: uplifting the standard of living of the poor of his state.
Populism can mean demagougery, but even if it applies to Long's case, it doesn't matter, because of how he used his position. I think its hard to deny that he didn't live up to, or practice his "every man a king" rhetoric, his policies had the elites of Lousiana so pissed off that they eventually assassinated him for it. FDR didn't go nearly far enough with the new deal in his opinion. The poor of Lousiana loved him for generations; Huey P Newton's parents named their son after Huey Long.
Intellectuals of (not just) America always wrote extensively of the dangers of popularism, be it about politicians inside or outside US. They act like they are talking about Trump, hell no. The Hueys, Allandes, Chavez were their target. These populists jeprordize the perfect democracy of the elites. Caesar was the despotic populist, his killers was the democracy loving angels. These myths are written and rewritten again and again.