9
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26701 readers
1570 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That heavily depended on the area you were in - both geographically and topically. Should we let them die from AIDs, discussed in a major metro? You'd likely be shunned, but not by everyone. Should we let them get married, almost anywhere? Debated by a minority, mostly against in all but they must liberal of places. Should we let them around kids, or are they trying to "turn" you? Lots of people had very homophobic takes on that anywhere.
2003 was right in the middle of the tv show Will and Grace's famous culture shifting run, but it absolutely wasn't done yet. Pew's long-running survey showed in '03 only 47% of people saying we should approve of homosexuality. Not domestic partnerships, not gay marriage, literally just "being gay" was minority approved. If you think casual homophobia wasn't totally normal in 03, go watch Friends, the most popular sitcom in America at the time. Go watch Seinfeld's famous "not that there's anything wrong with that" episode... admittedly a few years earlier, but set in one of the most gay-friendly places in America, and little had changed in the intervening years.
Gay rights and acceptance has had a meteoric rise in the last 20 years. I think that's why young people see this new wave of anyi-LGBT stuff so shocking, but for anyone that was around it's only shocking if you have a bad memory. It was bad just yesterday.
Wasn't that episode of Seinfeld pretty revolutionary for it's time and still lauded by the LGBTQ+ community as groundbreaking? You're talking about it as if it mocked gays, but it was and still is seen as a groundbreaking episode of one of the biggest TV shows in history, and it helped normalize homosexuality. Did you just get Seinfeld Effected?
That's...exactly my point. Go watch it today. It's cringey because they don't want to be perceived as gay. Lots of stuff that was very forward thinking at the time doesn't hold up. And the fact that it was groundbreaking further cements that things have changed incredibly from when those attitudes were common.