this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
267 points (94.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5763 readers
3877 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That negative or morally questionable topics are advertiser-unfriendly. Of course, advertisers don't need to run positive or moral ads, though.

[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I know you don't think that, but imagine thinking sex was negative or morally questionable. It all comes down to money, of course. "Can't have my brand associated with sex because some people hate sex and they might not give me their money! Better pretend like we can deny sex exists altogether." And then the same advertisers advertise beer using boobs.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 4 points 5 months ago

imagine thinking sex was negative or morally questionable

I think lots of Christian denominations find it a necessary evil. I did too before I became an atheist. Still, I think the platforms are so afraid of showing age-inappropriate content to someone they'd rather stash it away to somewhere nobody finds it unless explicitly searching for it.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Of course, advertisers don't need to run positive or moral ads, though.

Of course not, they're the customers so they're always right. And the "product" is tightly regulated.