33

Like in terms of climate change, political climate, wars, etc. soviet-bashful

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Canada could win climate change.

[-] egg1918@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

Until the US inevitably annexes it :(

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

:uncle-sam-shining:

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 months ago

I can't tell if you are serious. The country is so far up north and more than two thirds of the people live close to the US border.

[-] TerribleHands@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago

Isn't the point that global warming could make a lot more of the country liveable? Same with Russia, climate change could potentially turn frozen tundra into usable land.

[-] Dingus_Khan@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago

climate change could potentially turn frozen tundra into usable land.

Not really unfortunately. It will be warm enough to live there more comfortably, but the land isn't very usable compared to where people live now. Most of the tundra has very thin rocky soil and it is waterlogged and swampy. Just because it is warmer there doesn't mean the actual ground becomes like the soil farther south

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Isn’t de-thawed permafrost really good for growing food tho? Besides the y’know possible disease and shit.

[-] Magjee@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We don't know what's trapped inside the permafrost, as it thaws we might unleash some sort of super bacteria or even worse, the Reagan/Thatcher blood amalgam trapped beneath trapped below

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

The horrors of our cyberpunk future, where the Reagan flu or Thatcher cough take you…

[-] Dingus_Khan@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

Idk, from a nutrients/chemical standpoint probably? The issue is that there's like an inch of two of it over bedrock, instead of feet worth of good topsoil. There just isn't enough of it to grow food on the scale we do now with current methods. Not to say any of that is technically impossible, just that it would be a massive megaproject the likes of which humanity has rarely seen

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

That’s true… might happen that they pool all the permafrost earth into areas for farming. But indeed, a megaproject for the ages.

Probably the grasslands in Russia would be easier to manage. Just get a bunch of megafauna to stamp and poop around for a decade or two.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

It's not that simple. Sunlight is still an issue because that'll still limit the growing season and the soil itself is extremely poor.

[-] Edamamebean@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

No it couldn't. The soil in the vast majority of Canada is shit/nonexistent. The good soil is in the southern parts of the country and already being farmed. The northern parts are all bedrock with a thin layer of pine needles sprinkled on top. Good luck growing anything on that.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Maybe. I didn't think about this angle.

[-] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago

that global warming could make a lot more of the country liveable?

Global warming was melting roads in Canada like 2 years ago

[-] TerribleHands@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah but melty roads is a smaller issue than the apocalyptic famines anyone further south is gonna face.

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22721 readers
214 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS