96
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

The game had a 6 Million+ USD equivalent budget, they hired marketing. Banning people randomly looks stupid.

With the context of discussion, it's clearly just devs good and innocent, marketing bad. As if that main game page on the biggest game store in history wasn't unchanged for months despite controversies. So the devs either are: a) hostages of their hired marketing people b) completely disinterested how their work is being advertised c) perfectly ok with it

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I haven't even looked much into Palworld, but what I did get from marketing blurbs was "what if Pokemon... but edgy and grimdark?"

Those Schrodinger's Asshole claims that the marketing isn't the game's intended way to play seem rather after the fact to me.

I heard similar bullshit about the "Postal" series and how a player didn't have to do any edgelord atrocity enjoying at all if they chose not to.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
96 points (98.0% liked)

games

20472 readers
387 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS