[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

You're never too old to dress like a toddler. I make and wear short shorts with boats on them.

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 34 points 2 days ago

Lib content warning: There's a segment about why we got into Vietnam - smol bean president of South Vietnam was being overrun by communist hordes and asked us pretty please would we just destroy the jungle so he could win?

The video is great though.

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago

Link is broken - I think you need 'https://www/.' prepended, otherwise it prepends the hexbear URL to this post

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 62 points 2 months ago

Just looked at the history of Diego Garcia... why am I surprised?

13
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by luddybuddy@hexbear.net to c/diy@hexbear.net

A woman reached out to my coop shop because she is getting rid of her late son’s tools, specifically a 40W glowforge laser. We already have a laser, so I’m passing it on. NYC area, I believe.

Edit: laser is claimed!

Edit: laser was a scam :(

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 45 points 4 months ago
  • The top 1% have 31 times the average wealth
  • The 49% below them have 1.37 times the average wealth
  • The bottom 50% have 0.04 times the average wealth

(All calculated from the chart itself)

That seems like the top 1% are the bulk of the problem. If our richest had less than double what the poorest have, that would be a pretty good start.

I agree, there are a lot of people in that middle band who are not going to give up their 37% extra wealth, but I’m not sure this point is worth making. I’d rather get the lower half of that middle band to understand that they are not much better protected than those below them, than to tell the bottom band that they have nothing in common with half the country. Let’s draw a new chart with a top 10% or a top 20%, it will make this fight seem more possible.

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 68 points 7 months ago

It is largely due to seismic requirements, yes. Platform framed wood construction is very good in an earthquake. Brick sucks for seismic, and concrete or concrete block can be good for seismic loading, but is expensive. Concrete might pencil out if you were building apartments, but that’s usually illegal in most parts of a west coast city.

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 56 points 1 year ago

Weirdly I was doing the same to various other texts “stop arming Israel” etc and they didn’t stop until I sent the single word “stop”

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 66 points 1 year ago

https://theintercept.com/2024/03/23/intercepted-doctor-gaza-interview/

But [Palestinian medical workers], they are working on a daily basis on the most horrific, explosive trauma that you’ve ever seen. They’re doing sometimes 14, 15 amputations, mostly on children, per day, and they’ve been doing it for six months now.

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago

So it’s “rules based international order” except between armed corporations instead of armed countries. I can’t see how that would ever lead to problems /s

44

Butlerian Jihad now

19

Reading Giblin and Doctorow’s Chokepoint Capitalism and they used a term “freedom of contract” I hadn’t heard before, and which I realized that I have over-valued in my brain.

I’ve already broken through in a few spots, for instance employment contracts can obviously be exploitative and workers have little ability to negotiating the terms on their own.

Or bank loans, not because of the negotiation so much as the moral stigma attached to defaulting on loans. I can see that the bank took a risk, they can take the consequences too. Why add moral consequences to an action that already carries financial consequences?

I think this loans issue comes back to an association of business contracts with social promises, which I’ve spent some time breaking down.

The employment issue is another kettle of frogs. That comes back to consent and whether a person who is not entirely free can consent. I guess that’s the whole point of a revolution though. Any attempt to make contract law fairer to respect the fact that some parties are signing under duress will be thorny, because all people are under duress under capitalism.

There’s barely a question in there, but … thoughts?

[-] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago

Probability understander has entered the chat

23
Hex…bear? (hexbear.net)

This is showing up everywhere, can’t be a coincidence!

view more: next ›

luddybuddy

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago