74
submitted 11 months ago by fraxix@lemm.ee to c/gaming@beehaw.org

Yeah, no.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chloyster@beehaw.org 70 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean personally I wouldn't want to game like that on my phone, as it will almost certainly kill the battery and I need my phone for.... well phone things.

But I don't really see why it being $60 is at all weird. It's a $60 AAA game everywhere else too. Same game as it is there.

Edit: and it also unlocks the game on m1 or newer iPads and macOS devices... really not seeing why this is so egregious. It's $60 on steam too

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 20 points 11 months ago

I understand your perspective, but the way I see it, it's like renting a movie at home versus seeing it in a theater. For some people, the extra money to go to a theater is worth it. I'm not paying $20+ to see a movie once at home though, and especially not to see it on my phone. Discounted price for a discounted experience. If they want to charge $20 for the mobile version, and $40 for MacOS, then I'd be way more likely to try a triple-A game on a phone.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

But you get it with no compromises on MacOS, so why would they discount the price there? This is buy once, play "anywhere" (anywhere that's good for Apple). You don't pay less for a game you only play on a Steam Deck either.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Sure, then $20 for the mobile app, and $60 for MacOS (which should include a mobile copy). That would work for me too. I don't have a Steam Deck, but I for sure would not pay full price for a game just to play on the Steam Deck.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

I think the Switch and the Steam Deck have shown that portable games are worth every bit as much as non-portable, but in both of these cases, they output easily to the larger experience at home. I think Apple is providing that too. $60 still makes sense to me, since you're always buying the MacOS version which includes a mobile copy, which you said was acceptable.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

What if you don't have a Mac though, the MacOS copy is going to waste. I think Nintendo games are far too expensive as well. I own some, but I'm not happy with the price of the games (my kids love them though).

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

It's not a Mac OS copy and an iOS copy any more than I have a Steam Deck copy of a game and a desktop copy of a game. From what I can tell, it's the same thing. Obviously this is beneficial for Apple keeping you in their ecosystem, but this serves the same function. Quite frankly, I'm not sure why you'd have an iPhone if you don't have a Mac, but I know plenty of people do.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

I’m not sure why you’d have an iPhone if you don’t have a Mac

iPhones outsell MacBooks something like 10:1. The majority of people with iPhones, if they are playing games not on their phone, are using consoles and/or PC's.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Oh yeah, I'm aware. But the value proposition of an iPhone doesn't make sense to me if you don't also have a Mac.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

I guess that depends. A lot of flagship phones are reaching $1k+ these days, and I rely on my phone for a TON of things. I need the support, battery life, and I enjoy the Apple ecosystem (not just my MacBook, but the watch and AirPods too). I've found it made sense for me. I guess the value of things really depends on the buyer's perspective.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Wait, so you do have a Macbook. Maybe it's not M1, but if you enjoy that part of the ecosystem, you'll probably upgrade to one at some point. At which point, that gives you a "Mac copy" of the game too.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Oh, yeah. Sorry if I didn't mention that. I have an M1 Pro. I still wouldn't play the game on my MacBook. I have an ultra wide screen and there's no way my Mac would run the game well. I have a gaming desktop that is much more suitable for desktop gaming.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Heh, honestly, this is the problem with Apple's value proposition when it comes to gaming. You'll see elsewhere in this thread that I don't think Apple has shown they know how to really make a solid gaming offering, and this is a large part of why.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 10 points 11 months ago

Yeah honestly the idea that a port should cost less because it's a worse experience is stupid. As long as effort was put in and the game is still playable and as enjoyable an experience as other platforms whoever made it has any right to charge what they see fit for that platform.

Now should people buy it? Probably not and if it doesn't run as well you can absolutely raise the argument of it was a pointless cash grab anyways but...

Being upset that a developer wants to get paid for a game no matter what platform they put it on... not a big deal

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Erdrick@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the confusion by everyone around this pricing is really counterintuitive.
The product is exactly the same as its console / PC counterpart.
How well it runs on Apple products remains to be seen.
I for sure would not opt for it since I have a high end gaming PC.
Also, especially considering how Apple pulls products from their stores w/o refund…

I do hope that this sells somewhat well and opens the door for more developers to release their games on iOS / Mac.
I still think that Apple could build a proper gaming rig / console, but are in the chicken / egg situation still.

[-] ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

Apple is no doubt considering moving more heavily into the gaming space. They're looking for more revenue streams to keep feeding the corporate fantasy of perpetual growth, and there are only so many sweat shop laborers they can exploit. Wouldn't surprise me at all for them to buy a publisher like EA and create some steam competitor (or just leverage the Mac app store).

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 11 months ago
[-] chaircat@lemdro.id 19 points 11 months ago

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the answer to the question that's posted all the time on gaming forums of: "Phones are so powerful these days, especially compared to the Switch, why can't we have real games on phones without microtransactions?"

[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

You know what I commend them for this. If it helps move mobile gaming away from a microtransaction pay-to-win hellscape I'm for it.

[-] bblfrnz@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

It will be funny if they manage to implement microtransactions in some way.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yep. Apple is definitely going to attempt to get into the gaming console business again

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

Ha ha good one!

All kidding aside, I’d say it will be an Apple TV refresh or spinoff from Apple TV to focus on microconsole gaming

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago

Which is good for competition. Still ridiculous price though for mobile.

[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

I mean isn’t RE4 VR coming soon? Great candidate for the Apple VR headset (that I have seen no one irl have)

[-] llii@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Great candidate for the Apple VR headset (that I have seen no one irl have)

It's not released yet. And it doesn't have controllers. I doubt that it would be usable for classic VR gaming.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

Why are people upset about this? This is a million times better then a f2p gacha pay model. You're getting a complete game (I assume).

[-] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

Because it's still a mobile game and there's no way it's a great experience trying to play it on such a small screen.

I honestly don't understand the smartphone gaming fad because of the screen size issue. Who actually plays games like this on their phone that wouldn't rather buy a dedicated steam deck or other device?

[-] megapenguinx@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

It isn’t just a mobile game, you get the Mac and iPad versions as well so you effectively just get the game on Apple’s platform.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

That's entirely subjective

[-] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

...why would it cost less? It's $60 everywhere else.

[-] Chinzon@beehaw.org 13 points 11 months ago

Good freaking luck getting people to pay full price for a console game on a phone

[-] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Obviously that's a stigma Capcom is trying to break through. Most phones/tablets these days are even more powerful than a Switch, yet people pay $60 for games on the Switch but not on phones?

[-] fox@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago

Fortunately, Resident Evil 4 will support universal purchase. That means if you buy the game for your iPhone 15 Pro, but you also own an iPad and/or Mac that is equipped with an M1 chip or newer, you can play across all three of those devices without having to double dip.

Anyone know if it'll have cloud saves?

[-] T3rr4T3rr0r@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Literally no one will buy the game on ios

[-] Eggyhead@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

I'm not disagreeing with you by saying this, but I can imagine Apple sweetening the prospect by adding an AppleTV "Pro" to the ecosystem that will play intensive iPhone games like this with controller support. Tack-on MacOS playability as well and 1 purchase could mean you can play your save no matter where you are, across any platform within the ecosystem. Again, not saying this will happen. Just imagining how it could go.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@artemis.camp 2 points 11 months ago

There were go. Another person who agrees that apple is going to be competing with consoles again

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Clowncom can charge whatever they like, the market will quickly decide the actual price.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago
[-] toxicbubble420@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

sadly, as long as ppl keep buying overpriced electronics, the prices will continue to rise. I'll stick to emulation

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
74 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

30428 readers
271 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS