this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
491 points (97.1% liked)

News

25600 readers
4048 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tech billionaire Elon Musk agreed on March 2 with a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, for the U.S. to exit NATO and the U.N.

"I agree," he wrote in response to a post from a right-wing political commentator saying "it's time" for the U.S. to leave NATO and the U.N.

The news comes after several Republican lawmakers submitted a bill on the U.S. exit from the U.N., claiming that the organization does not align with the Trump administration's "America First" agenda.

The U.S. was among several countries, including Russia, Belarus, Israel, and Hungary, that voted against a U.N. resolution at the end of February condemning Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Both NATO and the U.N. were founded by the U.S. and other victors of World War II to promote diplomacy and cooperation between nations as well as to prevent another global war.

Musk, an unelected official, currently heads the so-called U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, which has cut significant amounts of government spending, including life-saving foreign aid.

U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized fellow NATO countries for their perceived lack of contributions to the military alliance and has called for a spending target of 5% of GDP for all members.

Kyiv sees NATO membership as a crucial safeguard against future Russian aggression, but Trump said in February that Ukraine "can forget" about joining the alliance, suggesting its bid was a trigger for the war—an argument echoed by Russian state propaganda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the US leaves the United Nations, does that mean they lose their security council veto power even if they somehow rejoin later?

Seems like something the other former global superpower, Russia, would be very happy to see happen.

I fail to see how this advances America's interests whatsoever. Republicans are huffing glue again.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

That's a similar case to UK leaving the EU. They had a lot of provisions just for them - tax exempts etc. If UK decides to rejoin they will have to renegotiate the terms and EU will not want to grant them the same relief as they had in the past.

If the American people had any sense they would cut the heads off their new kings.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nato is the only reason we European country bought those ultra expensive F35 paying billions to purchase and operate them.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder what's going to happen to the new Gernan rifles of the US military.

They’ll get expensive.

[–] himmyguap@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not going to end well for Elon Musk.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Who gives a shit about him. This is not going to end well for everyone.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I sincerely hope not.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If the US leaves the UN it permanently gives up its seat in the Security Council and its veto.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Russia magically inherited the USSR's security council seat even though they are not the USSR. When the US collapses, which part gets their old seat? (I vote we give it to Canada personally)

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Russia was always Russia. It was the seat of the USSR so it just stayed with Russia. If the US withdraws it gives up its seat. Canada would happily accept a permanent seat on the Security Council with veto.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, Russia took over the debts of the USSR as well, didn't they?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Srh@lemmy.world 139 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Leaving the UN would mean giving up US veto power. This would be one of the stupidest decisions of all time. No wonder Elon wants to do it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Name one time US veto power was used for good.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

For making an argument to appeal to musk, that's besides the point. In fact because the veto power being used for bad it is probably is a more appealing point

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

FYI: even North Korea is a member of the UN!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 196 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Will no one rid us of this treasonous billionaire?

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago (17 children)

There is a reason he travels with the little meat shield.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which treasonous billionaire? There's dozens to choose from.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Leaving NATO would cost the US over $100 billion in arms sales annually, so they won't do it. But to have and eat their cake they just don't need to honour article 5

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Idk, Trump already tried it at the end of his last term. These people don't have the USA's best interests in mind.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

To be perfectly honest they should probably kick the US out of it

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

The US intentionally leaving the organizations they have domination over as a means to exert soft power globally would certainly be good for weakening the US Empire. This seems like a case where the architects of Empire failed to raise successors and as such the ones with the reigns are now "true believers" in the architects' web of lies.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 61 points 2 days ago (4 children)

FUCK THIS GUY SO HARD. I swear to god this lunatic needs to be stopped.

[–] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

This lunatic is a danger for the world. He is an unelected unaccountable person with the power of the presidency. It’s terrifying.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago

Preferably a bullet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I publicly support the unaliving of musk

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xenobiotic@sh.itjust.works 104 points 2 days ago
[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Perfect, I'd rather they step away and let us remake it into a n EU group.

Leaving the US inside the NATO still gives them veto rights.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 79 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Both NATO and the U.N. were founded by the U.S. and other victors of World War II to promote diplomacy and cooperation between nations as well as to prevent another global war.

claiming that the organization does not align with the Trump administration

Checks out.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Except even the UK at it's most anti-EU still understood that NATO and the UN helped them more than it cost them.

The strength of the US as a power and economy would be devastated if they forfeited their standing in those organizations. Particularly the UN hardly demands anything of the US but broadly caters to US sentiment. It's a super cheap channel to exercise US soft power.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago

Basically destroy all things that made the US a world leader.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I publicly support ejecting this unelected scumbag from our country.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The USA have never been so weak and so alone. Seems like a good time to exit NATO

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

... which has cut significant amounts of government spending...

Has it, though? I mean, even its own over-inflated "receipts" are barely a microscopic percentage of a drop of the overall budget.

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›