this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23695 readers
215 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Australia not being number 1 should be a national shame

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Australia only needs ~200GW of capacity to meet demand I believe (5882PJ --> ~1.6M GWh, 8760h/year --> 186.5GW) math might be wrong there, but even if Australia was fully solar powered it would still have only 50% of China's installed capacity.

[–] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 1 points 4 minutes ago

They could be a green energy exporter. There's no reason to stop at 100%

[–] turmoil@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

China has 4x the population as the U.S. and this graphic says they have 3.69 as much solar power so that's slightly less per capita?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 23 hours ago

You also have to consider energy consumption per capita here which is far higher in US. And of course, solar isn't the only alternative energy used in China. Overall, fossil fuel use was already less than half of power capacity back in 2023.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

iirc their new installations in 2023 exceeded the rest of the world's installed capacity. They’ve gotten that much solar only in the last few years whereas all other countries lag very far behind in new projects

[–] GrafZahl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Makes sense, but also lowcarbonpower . org places yearly electric energy per person at 7 MWh in China vs 12.8 MWh in the US. The percentage of solar in the electricity mix works out to 8.3% in China and 6.9% in the US. YoY growth relative to overall electricity consumption in China is definitely higher as well, but I haven't checked in detail. What really sucks in China is the high dependence on coal which results in way worse CO2 than the US. Similar problem to Germany but even more so, since theres almost no gas power in China.

A while ago I was surprised to learn China only really started installing solar panels around the year 2012, while in germany the trend started in around 2005. US in 2010. (I chose the year where solar passed a threshold of 0.1% of overall electricity according to my source.

[–] GladimirLenin@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

that seems well low for australia

[–] Aradino@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Rooftop solar has been popular for a long while. Maybe it's just because of the comparative populations?

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Could it just be because Australia has a fraction the population of these other countries? One would assume that translates into less power consumption overall, even if not proportionate to population.

[–] GladimirLenin@hexbear.net 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Domestic rooftop solar is super common and really cheap due to government rebates. a quick google search says that over 20GW is generated by rooftop solar (i.e. solar panels feeding into the grid from people installing solar panels on their roof). i wasnt expecting total power generation to be above China or us or maybe India, but definitely above most eu regimes.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Nope. We are basically just a bunch of coal mines pretending to be a country, anything remotely good is spat on and villified by our media, which is majority Rupert Murdoch owned, and labor are spineless and the liberal coalition are straight up evil, so even the slightest positive change is hard fought and very quickly lost.

[–] shath@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

they don't have enough sunlight don't you know

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 19 points 1 day ago

But I thought China had dirtiest energy ever and China bad

[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surprised the UK is so high tbh. Given the particular focus on wind over solar.

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 1 points 5 hours ago

For a high latitude nation without consistent clear skies it’s odd to be doing so much solar.

[–] RedDawn@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

our poor poor oil magnates cri how will they feed their families!

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

China can support 55M citizens on solar alone, US can support 8.5M on solar alone

This is also skewed because China also has a much larger electrified transit system meaning that the power they are generating is being used in a way that offsets fossil fuels.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So let's see the relationship between per capita consumption and per capita production.....

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Together renewables comprised 43% of total capacity in China. So, 43% of per capita consumption is backed by renewable energy.

https://climateenergyfinance.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/CEF-China-monthly-energy-update-March-2025-1.pdf

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Neat. Tho I wonder if those numbers are all just self reported, or have been independently verified.

After all, history has shown us that China, like most nations, tends to overinflate the good news to overshadow the bad, so as to keep themselves looking "good" to the people of the rest of the world.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I have never seen these numbers disputed even in western media. If you're suggesting these numbers are in question then do provide sources to substantiate this fantastical claim of yours.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, no. Heaven forbid. We should always accept whatever the government tells us at face value.

[–] prole@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This is a frustrating approach you've taken here. If you were just going to conclude that you can't trust the data anyway, why bother asking all these questions? You just kept moving the goalposts and then when you finally couldn't move them anymore, "well, it's just fake then". Sounds really familiar 🤔

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

First off, I didn't move shit. I was honestly curious about the fucking data, and it's source.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If only there were other numerous sources you could look up with a quick google in the time it's taken you to make a clown of yourself here. If only!

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not the one accusing someone of shit just because I'm a fucking data nerd, jackass.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A data nerd would've actually looked up the data instead of clowning around here. It's not exactly hard to find. You're just a dweeb.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

oh go fuck yourself. I have lost every single bit of respect for your ass. I was genuinely curious about the data and the source and you start insinuating insults towards me. GO. FUCK. YOURSELF.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

I'd be so insulted if I had a shred of respect for someone whose intellectual maturity peaks at a toddler’s tantrum. May your future arguments involve less shouting and more coherence.

[–] T34_69@hexbear.net 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

China, like most nations, tends to overinflate

Which nations do not do this and how overinflated are most nations' statistics?

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It's harder for governments in nations with a free press, but it still happens.

I'm not sure which ones don't, tbh. I am giving the benefit of the doubt that there are, indeed a few governments that actually never lie to their people. I can't think of any of the top of my head, though.

Politicians lie. Politicians are what make up a government. Ergo, governments lie.

Quite honestly, the best way to get to the real numbers of any situation is to aggregate the data from many different sources and compare them.