Graph only goes back to 1900.
Only counting combatants.
Acting like the World War numbers are representative of wars throughout history instead of wars so abnormally large we called them World Wars.
Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.
Rules:
Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.
Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 4: No sectarianism.
Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Graph only goes back to 1900.
Only counting combatants.
Acting like the World War numbers are representative of wars throughout history instead of wars so abnormally large we called them World Wars.
I guess 100K dying in war per year is just acceptable to this dork because you can barely see it on the graph.
Seems like Iraq 2 isn't included at all for some odd reasons. Maybe it is only soldiers killed by the other soldiers or something dumb like that.
e: just saw the faint text explaining "death of combatants due to fighting" so civilian deaths are completely excluded jfc.
Advanced graph showing: in gaza, isntreal not doing anything
Yeah, this doesn't include civilian deaths. It's total horseshit.