this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
572 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3211 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 158 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Instead let's have more light rail and electric buses please.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As a disabled dude, let's have both. I can't make the short trip to my nearby bus stop, this would be taxes that I would never benefit from. But personal cars or services like these, I can make it down my driveway.

It blows my mind how many people, when talking about transportation, just completely forget that not totally-capable people exist. I guess we are all supposed to stay in one place and never go anywhere due to a physical disability.

I'll happily vote for taxes to enhance public transport, if everyone votes to keep services like these also improving and growing, especially in areas where municipal services are lacking or completely unavailable. Uber and Lyft were my only access to restaurants and groceries for a time. Shit gets expensive, but it's better than literally having to beg friends to get my groceries every week.

Just don't forget about those who can't enjoy the infrastructure.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Does your city not have a service where a small bus goes to your door? Here in Seattle you book a ride to where you need to go the day before and they come and pick you up. Heck, the small town I grew up in (2500 people) in the middle of nowhere had a similar service.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My current one does, but only goes to city limits, which isn't very useful (my doctors and such, for example, are a city over). My prior one, you had to live within half a mile of a traditional bus stop. I was just out of the 'service range', at like 0.65ish miles away.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That sucks. The service here is done by the county so it's pretty easy to get where you need to go. Or if you do not feel like booking a day in advance, they also have shuttle service to the light rail although that is less geared towards people with disabilities so it might not work for everyone.

Hopefully your region gets their heads out of their asses and starts providing basic services for people who need it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

there were legal taxis before uber, uber or self driving cars don't really change anything in that regard

[–] SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uber changed things a lot. Uber lets you easily request the ride and track the driver instead of calling for a cab then calling back 45 minutes later to find out where they are and find out they never sent anyone.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Uber changed things a lot.

technology changed things a lot, not uber. i don't really have detailed knowledge of us market, but where i am normal taxi services are using them as well, that's not really something created by uber. the only innovation uber brought to the field is that the technology allowed them to organize taxi service in really shady way (aka "the gig economy")

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

During COVID lockdowns, when lots of people had to work from home, people who couldn't work from home were all talking about how much faster it was to get to work and there was hardly any traffic on the roads.

Even if public transport doesn't benefit someone directly, getting a bunch of other people off the road still will.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, definitely. But the idea that 'only if it benefits me' really irked me, like 'why can't everyone just take public transportation' like it's just easy-peasy for everyone, guaranteed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand you can't access it as it is now, but ideally we'd have systemic change that would allow you to access public transport. I don't know what your handicap is, but (other than immune system issues) I don't see what could be wrong that is impossible for public transport to be built to allow for. Sure, you have to get to it, but that could be made a lot easier if we weren't in a system designed for cars where everything is a million miles away.

I could be totally wrong. I have no idea of anything about you. I just would prefer a system that helps everyone, which these cars won't. In particular, impoverished people are going to be even more fucked if we start accepting this as an option for handling disabilities. It doesn't seem like a good idea.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I turn 31 next month; I'm a stroke 'survivor' (kill me) who completely lost the fine motor control of my right arm, hand, leg, foot, toes/fingers, a quarter of my vision in both eyes, ~90% of my nerve response on my right side of my entire body, as well as a few other things. Literally getting down the road to the bus stop 1/8 miles away would take 20 minutes, be immensely difficult and tiring, my pulse would be 130+ the whole time and say if I'm going to go to a store and buy something, I can't because my one operable hand is holding my cane to keep me stable. I tried, so fucking hard, to continue 'normal' life. I despise what has happened to me and the fact that I will never, ever be whole again makes me regret calling help when I realized what was occurring. I live every day in hell, in a prison created by my own stupid body, and it will be like this until my premature death.

It's the hardest thing in the world to just get to the transportation. I hate that I'm saying it, but it's absolutely true :(

I'm not saying it's the best answer - fuck, I'm trying to get back to driving, it has always been a huge part of me, my happiness, my enjoyment of life - but at least it can help people like me until something better comes along.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yes, this is an underappreciated angle. Ridesharing bridges the gap for many people excluded by other forms of transit. My mom has limited mobility and ridesharing has really helped her.

[–] hiddengoat@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No shit. If you need to move people just look at where the most people are moved... airports. Every major airport has buses and rail in and out. There's no reason for cities to be built around individual transport when individuals are rarely transporting more than themselves.

[–] SynAcker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except for Detroit. That's because putting in light rail down the middle of the highway that could support it between the airport and Detroit city proper would actually make sense and we don't like that around here. Also, the Motor City hates bus services. Am I salty? Perhaps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It cost nearly $350 million to install a 2-mile-long rapid bus lane on Van Ness Maybe future expansions will be cheaper based on lessons learned, but it's clear that any infrastructure in SF is tremendously complicated and expensive. Doesn't mean it's not worth pursuing!

[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Creating new public infrastructure in the US can be extremely expensive, but it’s definitely still worth pursuing.

Nearly every in-depth study shows that for every $1 invested, the economic return is somewhere around $4-$5. And on top of that, failing to have adequate public infrastructure can cause serious economic consequences, which are compounded in areas with a lack of affordable housing.

Even though this article is a little old and sponsored by a party with a vested interest on the topic, I think it’s worth a read:

https://www.politico.com/sponsor-content/2018/06/when-public-transit

In my opinion, the problem for the US is convincing people/businesses that it’s worth it. Shifting away from cars and increasing investments in public infrastructure are two fairly unpopular measures right now, despite the actual economic evidence being overwhelming positive.

To me, it’s a solid example of where great leaders are needed to do something temporarily unpopular for the long term benefit of the constituents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah public engineering projects are crazy expensive. Roads included. I’m not saying this stuff will be cheap, just that not doing it is causing pretty awful problems

[–] virr@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is like a bunch of the self-driving companies are trying to kill the tech by making the public turn against them.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Nah, it's just that the "fail fast" process doesn't work or more accurately isn't acceptable for critical life-or-death systems.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was stoked for them to get here. My entire life between my house and my kid's school is inundated in self driving cars. I live it. I fucking hate them. And elderly people in Teslas.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

There's a good solution here: walkable, mixed use neighborhoods.

Self driving cars are just going to make traffic worse, by increasing people's tolerance to traffic.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Who would do that

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was in SF recently and got stuck behind a self driving car that was trying to turn down a closed street. The street had a police barrier up and it just sat there with its blinker on waiting for the street to open up. Meanwhile, everyone behind it is stuck there waiting for it to make a turn that it would never be able to make.

Eventually, after sitting in traffic for ten minutes, not knowing what was up, cars in front of me started to move around it and then I realized what was going on. I understand why people hate these things.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I had a similar thing happen a human driver the other day. Except there was no barricade...they just wouldn't turn. They finally made the left turn on the fourth yellow lol.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] macattack@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

They Streisand Effect'ed the fuck out of themselves

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep looking but can't find it. I keep just finding people saying the pedestrian was hit by a vehicle with a driver and thrown under a driverless car which spokepeople are saying tried to stop as fast as possible to minimize damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/driverless-cruise-cars-cameras-recorded-moment-woman-was-struck/amp/

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If the autonomous car reacted correctly then why wouldn't they release the video which corroborates this?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It takes a lot to make Tesla look bad in comparison.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are we sure Tesla hasn't done this too? Sounds like something they'd do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I live in the Bay Area and mostly ignored these developments because I primarily stick to East Bay. But as my new job has me going to SF on a semi-regular basis, I can’t help but be mildly afraid of getting taken out by an AV. Gdi.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yesterday I saw a couple, including a Waymo that passed a few feet away as I got in my car. It proceeded without incident but I couldn't help feeling nervous to trust that its lidar saw me and it interpreted me as a human.

[–] Goronmon@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It proceeded without incident but I couldn’t help feeling nervous to trust that its lidar saw me and it interpreted me as a human.

I can't say I view an average driver with any more trust though.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, if anything it helps expose that we rely too much on cars as a society. That being said, I can make eye contact with a driver, judge their attention more effectively. I do hope driverless tech eventually improves but am concerned about the responsibility of some of the companies currently in the lead of developing the technology.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ofc, you can still make eye contact with someone and have them then say "oh my god, I didn't see you there!" because there were spacing out/wandering in their mind.

[–] ji59@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would guess the autonomous vehicle is safer then the hit & run driver who threw the pedestrian under that AV.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

then they shouldn't have tried to cover it up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Perhaps, but withholding footage is not a good look. Good thing the police never withholds foota… oh

load more comments
view more: next ›