this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
260 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
191 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] towerful@programming.dev 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess this is approaching the "find out" phase.
VW/Audi group fucked around with emission tests, and they found out.

[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They found out what? Their business wasn't affected at all as far as I can tell. They should have been broken up and shut down but instead they got caught doing the same thing AGAIN.

So yeah, not sure what Tesla is going to find out other than "money means you can get away with anything", which Musk already knows well.

And just to be clear, I own a Tesla. I just got it back from the shop after ELEVEN MONTHS because those fucking tools would rather sell more cars on false promises than divert some parts to repair the cars they've already sold. I love that car but I'm selling it. Nobody should go anywhere near Tesla cars until they get their supply chain shit together.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did they loan you another car during that time, or were you stuck paying on a car you couldn't use for 11 months? I'd consider suing if it was the latter.

[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was absolutely the latter. And I absolutely would sue if I didn't have serious health issues (hello, cancer!) to deal with instead. It takes a lot of time and effort to deal with something like that, and that's just not in the cards right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Yes, they found out that there's no real drawback to falsifying statements.

[–] lemillionsocks@beehaw.org 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the point Tesla... next time dont lie about your range.

[–] agegamon@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly the range isn't even an issue. Yes they did something wrong, but IMO in terms of misleading customers it's not at the top of the list long list. They have all this horseshit about "full self driving" that they stick all over their website with pretty animations and graphics.

Then you actually read into it and the fine text says "oh by the way, it's technically just a slightly suicidal/homicidal level 2 ADAS that nobody has signed off on, and that Tesla can yank it out from under you at any time, and thst WILL be conveniently forgotten about and valued at $0 if you decide to trade in your car with tesla, but it's cool brosky just do it for the likes"

[–] lemillionsocks@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of the venture capitalist driven industry has been fueled by an ask for forgiveness not permission move fast and break thing philosophy tesla included. It's about time the law start catching up with them instead of caving to their will because its a TOTALLY NEW idea because an app is involved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 67 points 1 year ago

"If you tell our customers we misled them, that would be bad for our business!"

[–] frog@beehaw.org 51 points 1 year ago

So, basically... "an investigation into whether we lied to customers in order to sell them stuff would have an impact on our business". Well, yeah, that's true. Shockingly, customers don't like being lied to about the quality of the goods they're buying, and hearing that there's enough indication of lying to warrant a full probe into it would make future customers hesitant to buy. While wrongdoing hasn't been proven yet, I can't imagine this probe would be happening "just in case" Tesla lied - there must have been a high volume of complaints from customers who aren't happy. The precedent set by not investigating would be awful. It'd basically say businesses can claim whatever they like about their products, because being caught lying about them would always have the consequence of "material adverse impact on our business".

[–] TomMasz@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a "genius", he sure is slow on the uptake.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He sure is lucky for someone so stupid.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have to wonder if the entire concept of the business savvy billionaire is just a case of survivorship bias. Not for all of them, but a lot.

I mean, if you get the population of the civilized world together and have them start flipping coins, plenty of people are going to get heads 20 times in a row. Or if they’re from a rich family maybe they only have to get 10 heads in a row.

(Used round numbers for illustration. 20 heads in a row is only about 1 in a million, 10 heads is one in a thousand.)

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So much of it is luck, starting from birth onwards.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Yep. I was going to write that maybe somebody like Warren Buffett would stand out as the real deal who is consistent and could do it again. But even if that’s true and he is 100% unique skill, he STILL got very lucky by birth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

It's more like, it costs a lot of money to get a chance to flip those coins in the first place, so someone who's already rich to begin with will get many more tries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He warns? Does he now? I know that bashing journalists is a rightwing ting, but these dudes are really complicit in all of this shit. How the hell do you come up with that kind of headline? He warns

[–] TonyaCanning@mstdn.social 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@MayonnaiseArch @Five This is why people argue government officials shouldn't hold individual stocks. He is hoping there are enough people in a position to gut the investigation who own a lot of Tesla stock.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

Bingo! If accountability hurts the bottom line, then The Big Money will argue against accountability in any form.

Big Money got a mighty voice.
Big Money make no sound.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] b0rlax@beehaw.org 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the truth about your business hurts your business, you don’t have a good business.

[–] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you seriously suggesting that a company (tesla) that does 50 billion in sales is NOT worth three times the value a company that does 250 billion (toyota)?

The Tesla valuation is such a fucking joke. They are a "bigger" company that Toyota, Honda, or Ford despite not even doing a fraction of their outright sales, and likely making less on every single one of those sales. Their only advantage is that they were making electric cars before it made economic sense to make them. Now that everyone else is jumping in they are going to die on the vine because people can get a real EV that costs half of a Tesla and actually works.

Tesla DID have a chance of leveraging their early market presence by either introducing a higher quality or cheaper vehicle that could compete with their new competitors. Their existing presence could have captured enough of the market to stand against them if they had a product that was in the same league. Instead they made the fucking Cybertruck.

[–] b0rlax@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right, so it’s a bad company, like I said.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, that’s how consequences work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MegaMichelle@a2mi.social 30 points 1 year ago

@Five

"Well hey, now, let's not get hasty. If you investigate me for crimes, you will find that I committed crimes! That would be bad for mee. Is that really what you want?"

[–] SariEverna@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

Yes, that is the point, Tesla.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

then maybe you shouldn't have lied to your customers about your cars

load more comments (1 replies)

IE "we lied, but don't tell nobody!"

[–] sim642@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So it has the intended effect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's how it works, you fucked around and something something

[–] TheTimeKnife@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

Well yeah buddy, that's why you used fraud to increase profits.

[–] halfcalf@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are there so many comments that start with "@five"? I feel like there's something about how the site works that I'm misunderstanding. Isn't the user who posted the article automatically notified when someone posts a comment?

[–] basidialtiger@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's from mastodon users, and how mastodon works when replying. I haven't personally used mastodon though, so someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's correct. @aral@mastodon.ar.al discovered and boosted the post, and it snowballed across the Tootiverse. They're all pinging @Five because that's how Mastodon does post replies.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 1 year ago

It's somewhat annoying but also really interesting that the two interop relatively well due to their use of a common protocol (ActivityPub). I mean imagine Twitter users being able to browse and comment on Reddit posts directly on Twitter - that's essentially what's happening.

It's probably not too difficult to modify Lemmy to hide mentions that are at the start of a comment, which would solve the issue.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

appears to be mastodon users simply formatting their responses as if this was a mastodon (microblog) post instead of lemmy post, which is nbd.

[–] SteveClough@metalhead.club 10 points 1 year ago

@Five Oh good.

What he means is that being found out for lying will impact how much people believe him.

Well no shit Sherlock.

[–] Obdurodon@hachyderm.io 9 points 1 year ago

@Five Fancy way of saying "we can't win without cheating"

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Is that how that works? /s

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good. Fuck that chowder-head #fascist.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Anyway.

[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Elon = moron*c^2

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

You gave warning a whole new meaning.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

This sounds a lot like a threat.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Looking forward to the mob using that as a legal defense.

[–] tchauhan@mastodon.mit.edu 6 points 1 year ago

@Five Most Si valley businesses are built on exaggerated claims. You don't work your way to wealth. You lie and pillage your way to it.

[–] lin11c@toad.social 5 points 1 year ago

@Five @voron I can’t wait until this vile grifter is in prison.

load more comments
view more: next ›