255

Palestinians are asking, 'Are you with us?' American Jews are showing we are (www.972mag.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Technically this is more US news than world news, but it's World News enough, and has enough up and down votes that I'll allow it.

Rule of thumb:

Event happening somewhere in the world outside the US? - World News.

Article about how Americans feel about an event happening in the world outside the US? - Not world news. Maybe news, maybe politics, would depend on the context.

But Americans reacting to a world event doesn't make it world news.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago

Noted, thanks.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 6 points 10 months ago

So wait… lemme get this straight; the USA isn’t in the world?

The US is OUTSIDE or SEPARATE from the world.

Ok. Got it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

When it comes to world news, yes, that's correct. News exists for US news.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Glad this is an opportunity for people to see how nuanced these issues can be.

Good thing this is making more people anti-Zionist and acknowledge that criticism of Israel is not criticism of Jews.

[-] kleenbhole@lemy.lol -2 points 10 months ago

Some American Jews. Mostly the women.

[+] oiez@lemmy.world -6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Speaking as an American Jew, Hamas should release the hostages. Until they do, a ceasefire feels impossible.

[-] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 84 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hamas doesn't give a fuck about peace, ceasefires, children, or anything else.

That doesn't mean Israel should get carte blanche to do whatever they want. Let's not forget that prominent members of the current Israeli government have expressed very clear genocidal desires of their own.

[-] Squid@lemmings.world 31 points 10 months ago

I think we should just shove both leaders into a submersible

[-] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Honestly? Yeah I don't see any way around this than to simply predicate all aid to the region on conditions.

Israel on the demand that not one more brick be laid anywhere outside Israel's borders and a plan with enforcement mechanisms to dismantle the settlements that are there in order to guarantee the possibility of a sustainable Palestinian state with an economy under their own control (I.e that trade, commerce, construction, monetary policy be Palestinian and not imposed by Israel). That reparations be paid to families of the victims of this bombing campaign and settler violence over the years, that those who perpetrated violence be brought to justice.
Palestine on the condition that they renounce the right of return, that they apprehend and surrender all militants to an international tribunal, that they recognize Israel, that they pay reparations to the families of Israelis that have been killed over the years.
Egypt and Jordan on the demand that they participate in the enforcement of the above.
for all parties, that Jerusalem be declared either an international city, or joint capital (split East-West).
that Iran be completely isolated from the region. This is a tough one, they have their fingers deep within Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Lebanon.

It's unclear how anything else can work.

If this requires a permanent UN military mission with the right to shoot to kill any threat all along the border of both Palestine and Israel, I'm fine with it. If it means Israel bitches and moans about how unfair it is, who cares. It's about time they respected and enforced the law. If it means Palestinians need to fight to dismantle their own militant orgs and fight for peace, at least they will have a light at the end of that tunnel instead of the despair of the past 70 years (and earlier too, tbh).

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Palestine on the condition that they renounce the right of return…

One wonders why it should be Palestine that gives up this right. Remember, it was Israeli paramilitaries that took over the Palestine Mandate despite (admittedly fucked up) plans by the UN for after British colonial rule left.

Like, your argument is basically fate-acompli. It’s a horribly complicated thing, but unilaterally evicting one party from a homeland isn’t going to lead to peace.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

Renouncing right on return

Yeah that's not happening, and it shouldn't.

[-] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works -5 points 10 months ago

Israelis will never accept to become a minority. It's as simple as that.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

So palistinians should give up on access to their (equally ancient) homeland?

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

It’s wrong. But a lot of past wrong wars set current borders and taken land. At some point you just need to accept it. Just in the ‘800 Europe was completely different and yet no one cares now (mostly)

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

The difference between 800s Europe and 1947 Palestine is about 1100 years and the fact that 1947 is still in living memory.

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

Sorry I meant 1800/1900. It’s living memory yes but people will keep dying otherwise. Don’t get me wrong I hate it. As much as I hate Russia for trying to do something similar in Ukraine

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

People will keep dying and it will keep being israel's fault. This is the reality do not twist it.

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Agree to disagree

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago

“Afrikaners will never accept losing the majority to blacks” - South African apologists in the 1980s.

If your nation depends on apartheid, it must be rebuilt on a foundation of justice.

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, nah.

That option lets Israel get away with everything and punishes everyone else in the region.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah I’m much more in the aid is reduced pending peaceful single state solution with Palestinians and Israelis having equal legal standing and protections

Is it going to be happy? Fuck no. Setting aside grudges and ending feuds is awful and nobody likes it. But hospitals stop being bombed in response which sure is nice.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

They can set up grievance courts to deal with the hatred and resentment like Rwanda did.

[-] oiez@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

You know this is a good plan because all the orthodox hardliners on both the Israeli and Palestinian side would hate it.

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Beautiful. A dream, but would be great

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 10 months ago

And i thought my plan of putting both in a room with only water and only release them when there's a peace treaty is brilliant.

Visiting titanic will be nice.

[-] samokosik@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

I agree. Both leaders are just way too radical to find a solution.

[-] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

Hamas should go die in a ditch. Doesn't mean Israel should murder civilians wholesale.

[-] Machinist3359@kbin.social 55 points 10 months ago

As an american jew, hostages don't justify genocide. Never again means never again.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 18 points 10 months ago

“No talks until you give up your leverage”

Preconditions for a ceasefire mean you aren’t serious about a ceasefire.

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Do you think Hamas cares to “talk” or “negotiate” anything?

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

why else take hostages and spend resources keeping them alive lol

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

I mean yes. Being bombed is usually not a good time.

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

Do you think they don’t like it? Israel warns when and where they’re bombing by also hijacking palestinians media. Hamas makes it impossible for the civilians to flee. They want them to die so they can blame Israel for the casualties. Israel sucks. Hamas sucks more

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Speaking as another American Jew, killing innocent people should not be the response to a hostage situation.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago

The thing is: Their only leverage is the hostages (which Bibi apparently wants to bomb to death). Without leverage you can't really have negotiations.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 13 points 10 months ago

In return for the thousands of Palestinians imprisoned without trial, right?

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Yes, and how do you think they plan on negotiating for said ceasefire?

spoiler

with hostages lol

[-] stella@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Are you saying Israel is justified in killing thousands of children because Hamas has about 100 hostages?

Weird how the Palestinians should always be mad at Hamas for Israel's retaliation, but Israelis shouldn't be mad at their government for Hamas' retaliation.

[-] eskimofry@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

At this point Israel might have actually killed more Jews in Gaza than Hamas. Hostages too if they don't stop the indiscriminate shelling.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

The fire was ceased on October 6th

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023

255 points (86.7% liked)

World News

38563 readers

2578 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.