the 'parental rights' agenda
We have really got to stop letting these dishonest fuckwads claim the nominative high-ground.
It doesn’t hold up the moment you scrutinise the name.
Parents rights to what? The answer is basically “ownership” of their children. Fully control their children.
Children aren’t possessions, they’re people.
Yeah I support youth liberation. They obviously need guidance and all that, but guidance is not what these people are doing. They want their children to have no say in their lives and no information about the world
100% this
Yeah, good luck with that. Americans fall for "X for Freedom/Liberty" all the time.
Not that I put much stock in the latest poll that shows Biden trailing Trump in key states a whole year out, but it's an indicator that people are so fucking dumb, they can't remember how awful things were four years ago without being constantly reminded.
Conservative media goes out of its way to blame Biden for his successes. Even during the debate, Ramaswamy said that like 3 or so tons of fentanyl had been caught at the border. Others mentioned that "encounters" were higher than they've ever been before. And then they went on to blame Biden for his failure to secure the border as they praised him for succeeding.
Conservatives are liars superior.
What? You didn't vote yes on the Free Patriots Saving Children from Terror and Kicking Out Gay Commies act? What are ya? I mean, yeah, the fine print lets priests finger kids at school and gives rocket launchers to police departments, but so what? You don't wanna look like a lib; do ya?
Freedom to kneel for the anthem?
No not like that!!!!
Amen. They make their platform sound so moral until you look at their doctrine for more than a minute
This is why anything with “for liberty” or “right to” in the name immediately makes me suspicious.
I wish more people realized this. “Right to Farm” was just passed in Texas by voters by a wide margin - long term it just removes accountability from agricultural giants and even emboldens them to push out small farmers.
It was advertised as being for small farmers 🤦
Like so many conservative groups, their stated goals are really the opposite of what their actions show their real goals to be. MoL claims to support parental rights. But if they really support parental rights then they should be supporting my right to let my child have access to any book I choose in the library. I want them to have access to books about different races, and cultures, and lifestyles. This group wants to remove all books from school libraries that they feel are inappropriate. In other words, they are trying to take away my parental rights to decide for my child and instead only allow my child to access books that support a conservative agenda.
Moms for "Liberty"
Maybe don't quote Hitler in your newsletter next time, morons.
Kinda glad they did? Makes it easier to know their priorities.
They're already learning this.
I am in a solidly blue district. 4 out of the 7 school board candidates, ALL of the non-incumbents, were running on some sort of "family values" or "parents' rights" platform. A couple of them were within a few hundred votes of taking a seat last year. This year, their statements to media were highly scrubbed because they knew to tread carefully and avoid the dog whistles. And this week, one of them unseated an incumbent (and the only POC in the group). I'm glad the trend is going in the right direction nationally. But I wouldn't call for a victory lap just yet.
That was a feature, not a bug.
I missed that. What was the quote?
Holy shit. They even cited him. Talk about tone deaf idiots.
Talk about tone deaf idiots.
Yes, indeed Republicans.
Good god, I thought it was an unattributed quote that some asshole thought was cute. I'm sure there are plenty of Hitler quotes that make sense out of context, but fuck me.
They still won 50 seats out of 24,000 up for election. Even that is too many.
How many candidates did they run? It certainly wasent 24,000.
They ran/endorsed ~365 or so, according to the article.
Good. Fuck terroristts.
last year we had a few sus folks running for local spots. They knew they were in enemy territory so they could mostly be identified by how evasive they were in any discussions.
There have been a few notable school districts in my state that got duped by these people over the last 10 years or so, and the pattern is pretty much the same:
It's a huge waste of time and money, and in the end everyone hates these fucks even more than they did to start with, and people are even more interested in voting in local elections. I'm not sure it's a winning long-term strategy for the fascists. You could argue it works to get more progressives and moderates to the voting booth in the long run.
Glad the agenda flopped.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News