Pay no mind to the widespread layoffs and skyrocketing prices.
What's your source?
Recent December data shows unemployment rate at 3.7% with 199,000 added jobs:
Nonfarm payrolls rose by a seasonally adjusted 199,000 for the month, slightly better than the 190,000 Dow Jones estimate and ahead of the unrevised October gain of 150,000, the Labor Department reported Friday. The numbers were boosted by sizeable gains in government hiring as well as workers returning from strikes in the auto and entertainment industries.
The unemployment rate declined to 3.7%, compared with the forecast for 3.9%, as the labor force participation rate edged higher to 62.8%. A more encompassing unemployment rate that includes discouraged workers and those holding part-time positions for economic reasons fell to 7%, a decline of 0.2 percentage point.
The multitude of headlines weve been seeing for months of companies laying off thousands at a time https://news.crunchbase.com/startups/tech-layoffs/
Thanks for the link. If I'm reading it correctly, the total number of tech layoffs for the whole 2023 was 191,000, which is less than the 199,000 new jobs added in just the single month of December 2023?
In 2023: More than 191,000 workers in U.S.-based tech companies (or tech companies with a large U.S. workforce) were laid off in mass job cuts.
As someone that works in tech, it should be noted that many of those laid off were probably able to find work elsewhere. It's a shitty market for tech right now, but there are jobs out there.
The industry that is really struggling is recruitment. Many people that I spoke to that were laid off from Amazon are still struggling to find work a year after losing their jobs. If you build a career around hiring in tech, and the industry goes into layoff-mode for 16 months, there's not much demand for your skills.
Inflation being higher than wages?
Layoffs (especially in the tech industry) have been highly-publicized, not widespread. There's a difference.
You shouldn’t be getting downvoted. It’s true. Tech companies went on a huge hiring spree during Covid. The layoffs don’t even bring employment anywhere close to before that hiring spree.
As long as the rich people are making more money, the economy is great. The poors don't matter when it comes to the economy. We suffer when it's doing well, we suffer worse when it's doing poorly.
It’s because the field of economics is just bullshit
No no, you can definitely predict money stuff with a crystal ball and arguing with people.
Definitely haha. Economics is similar to theoretical physics in that most of it only works in a vacuum, but I respect theoretical physicists more because they tend to view people as more than just cogs in the money machine.
When you study economics you literally spend 0 hours learning how to predict macroeconomic outcomes such as inflation/gdp growth. The reason is that these systems are too complex to predict well, except in the very short run. Yet policymakers continue to ask economists to make long-run predictions, and many continue to comply.
I personally was asked to be a member of an expert committee for my country’s central bank. For any prediction my truthful answer was: I don’t know, so they kicked me out.
what kinds of stuff did they want you to predict?
The economy is doing great. That means all the poors are getting poorer, just as intended.
As one particular youtube Economist puts it: nobody can predict the future, least of all economists.
The best they can ever do is look at the data in front of them and say, "well, in the past we've seen this sort of situation lead to X, so we think that we're likely to see X again in the near future." On top of that much of what they are doing is probability based best guesses. So, they may be looking at economic data and say, "well, we think it's a 65% chance of X." And then "news" organizations will report that as "Economists think X will happen, and here's how it's going to cause DOOOOOOOOM!" Of course, those numbers assume they have good data, which is not always the case.
That said, it's probably better to bet with macroeconomists than against them. They may get it wrong, but they probably get it right more often. Just don't bet the entire farm on what they say. 'Cause, you know, they do get it wrong from time to time.
youtube Economist
holy shit lmao
He's on Youtube and claims to be an Economist. I can't prove it one way or the other, though I personally believe he is. Didn't want to look like I was advertising, so didn't name/link him and also didn't want to claim his tagline as my own.
There are plenty of highly educated making videos explaining happenings in their fields. This ridicule is uncalled for
lol
Young people - oh my god old people believe everything they read on Facebook!
Also young people - well this guy on YT says he's an expert so it must be true
This is why I follow the old saying: "Believe everything you read in the newspapers."
No information is better than the sources provided
We're just saving up for an even better recession.
But homelessness is up 50% since 2015, with this year being the largest increase since... We started keeping numbers.
But nope no recession here. Can't have one if we just keep redefining the word! Lmao.
no recession if the homeless keep working
The difference is how the money is being distributed
The 1% can't let the market crash until the 99% are long.
Articles like these are incredibly bearish IMO
How many articles have been out like "company name is laying off 10000"? I don't trust the soft landing. For example all the toxic assets still exist from the bank mergers, the only thing they did was sell off regular assets
imo there won't be a recession until economists stop predicting one. As soon as they start talking about a boom then you should get ready.
When inflation was above 5% the real interest rate (nominal interest rate minus inflation) was still negative, which is expansionary. Even now that inflation has cooled off it’s still only positive 2% which is not that high by historical standards.
Couple that with firms reopening, and taking staff off furlough, and it’s not really that surprising that a recession didn’t eventuate. This wasn’t the 70s and early 80s with stagflation.
Court vizers amazed reality didn't conform to their burned chicken bones.
You've got to have the euphoria stage first. "Soft landing achieved", "the naysayers are wrong", and "things are amazing now" are the kinds of things you hear at such times. The idea is to allay people's fears so that they keep or increase the amount of money they have in the market. After that, you crash hard and fast so that people who can't afford to ride it out, have to withdraw money at market lows. This maximizes return for the rich who can swoop in and buy on the cheap. Then the narrative will be "the signs were all there", "any idiot could have seen it coming", and "it's the people's fault for being irrationally exuberant and irresponsible with their money".
This guy gets it
Hear ye, hear ye
"unprecedented, once in a hundred years phenomenon"
Give it 2 more months, and it should be shot.
You CANNOT have as-much missing-supply-chain as we now have, and remain viable, endlessly.
_ /\ _
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.