this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
314 points (97.6% liked)

General Discussion

12084 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi! sorry for the random topic πŸ˜…

Youtube keeps getting more and more annoying. Is there a good other platform where to migrate? If people were to migrate, where would they go?

the thing I liked about youtube is the massive amount of content, and knowing that if I upload a video, it's really easy to watch by others. I like the ability to follow channels too.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mizu6079@lemmy.world 126 points 1 year ago (2 children)

PeerTube is the federated alternative for YouTube.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought that said PeeTube for a second and thought, "Wow, did they pivot."

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean Lemmy is the poop part of the Fediverse, would make sense for there to be also a pee part

[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Dude......please lmao

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also have had some solid results with https://odysee.com/.

[–] syboxez@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not a fan of how corporatized it has been getting.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I want to see these platforms try make money. It's a video hosting platform. It needs to be sustainable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hactar42@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There is Nebula, but it requires a subscription. However, all of the creators on it are part owners, so you know they get a better deal than whatever YouTube is giving them. Well worth the $50 a year to me.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

I really think this sort of youtuber coop + fediverse is the best long term solution.

Since hosting videos is expensive and many youtubers rely on youtube for income, I think paying to watch makes sense, especially if it's reasonably priced with a large cut going to the creators like with nebula. The main downside is that it's hard to imagine most people switching to a subscription based service, so creators will still have to rely on youtube for discoverability.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep seeing YouTuber mentioning it. I didn't know they were part owners.

[–] Dioz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Wendover Productions who is also a part owner has uploaded a great video about the topic recently:

https://youtu.be/Alqt6RCEWdM

[–] zlatiah@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Second this, as of right now Nebula is the only service I know which is even remotely comparable to Ytb's scale... unfortunately is behind a paywall and is mostly only for infotainment content. Peertube is getting there but not yet. And ofc we don't talk about the O site.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think it's realistic to expect a free to use alternative to YouTube to exist. The project itself was never profitable, and now that they're really struggling to give people ads they're introducing these anti adblock measures. It simply costs too much in resources to store and send out high quality video content for free.

[–] kalipike@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely this. As much as I'd love a free (and preferably FOSS) alternative to YouTube that's just as good, I don't see a realistic way for that to happen. Video is expensive.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it'll happen on some level eventually. Storage costs are only going to go down over the long term. Sure, higher resolution video is bigger, and they'll probably keep going even higher, but most people don't care past a certain point. It won't happen soon, but give it 10 or so years I could see it being more viable.

[–] kalipike@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Possibly, and hopefully! And it is true that storage will only get cheaper, and theoretically bandwidth will be too. But for now, bandwidth is expensive and (fast) storage is also expensive, despite being much more affordable than it was not too many years ago.

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t think it’s realistic to expect a free to use alternative to YouTube to exist...It simply costs too much in resources to store and send out high quality video content for free.

I agree, and at the same time I think this raises the great question of, why did anyone think it was a good idea to put all of this on a single site to begin with? Ideally it sounds great, courtesy of its convenience and...I'm sure there's more but I'm blanking on other qualities that don't seem to lean on presumptions of benefits from a singular site's operations.

Realistically it was almost always going to be a better idea to distribute the load of high density media like this across different operators to ensure a variety of video production, better redundancy through no single point of failure, reduced operational costs as a lower volume of data has to be stored & processed, and so on. Of course, the problem remains by & large the network effect in terms of getting any large group of people to disperse or move anywhere else, because it's not like there haven't been alternatives attempted, nor alternative technologies to enable alternatives to exist.

However, there's also the problem of any alternatives or competitors framing themselves as an alternative or competitor to YouTube to begin with. That's a losing approach from the start, instead they need to frame themselves as themselves, not a different YouTube, but an independent video host with xyz unique features.

If you don't believe that could be a successful approach, then you're simply ignoring the brief popularity of Vine and the rapid success and continuing popularity of TikTok.

[–] rockhandle@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Being realistic here, there's no worthwhile competitor to youtube at this point in time. You have some stuff like odysee, LBRY, peertube etc. However, the amount of content on them is basically nothing compared to youtube and there's little incentive for creators to move there due to how difficult it would be to monetise your content in those places.

My best pick would be invidious which is a private & ad-free yt frontend that uses it's own API and doesn't need JS. I already use it all the time. It's good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As @mizu@lemmy.world said, the software PeerTube exists. However, due to the extreme costs of video hosting, a general purpose PeerTube instance does not exist. It would cost alot for video storage and more importantly moderators to ensure content is not illegal.

Maybe if we all paid @ruud@lemmy.world like $20/month we could get PeerTube.world

[–] sam@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It would be nice if peertube had an integrated subscription/payment method so you could support and subscribe to content you enjoy.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What we need is for PeerTube to use ActivityPub for the searching and listing, but something like Bittorrent to distribute the load of the content delivery.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

I believe that's already built into PeerTube. The p2p (torrentlike) aspect that is.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

You are literally describing PeerTube.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cakeofhonor@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Lots of good suggestions already, but if you have to stick to YouTube, you could always use a third party client. FreeTube for desktop and Newpipe for Android. They function great. You don't need an account and can organize and export your history and subscriptions, it's a much better way to interact with YouTube than the official methods. Newpip even allows for background playing.

[–] wanderingmagus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Doesn't ReVanced still work?

[–] Invalid@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I use it every day. Works pretty well if you patch with the recommended version, but it's not perfect. Still good enough to daily drive tho.

Yes! It's wonderful!

It also kills reddit adds in the official app. That said, I'm not sure how much I'll use it at this point... Still, I like having the option loaded up!

[–] swab148@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yes it does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] human_one@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the recommendation, I didn't knew about freetube

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] faltuuser@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

That's unfortunately the truth. Hosting any kind of competitive video platform requires millions of dollars to handle these huge quantities of data. We won't have a serious FLOSS YouTube replacement any time soon.

[–] alexthelion335@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Odysee is probably the biggest one, with a lot of creators having their youtube synced with it. Peertube is also an option, but I've never used it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

PeerTube or Odysee.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Might want to check out YouTube Vanced, It's a super easy to install app that accesses YouTube but blocks all ads and everything annoying and you can control everything and play with your screen off and all that. So just do that until youtube becomes unusable and then we'll go to the alternative once when we have to.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] laurel@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

https://odysee.com/ is blockchain-based, built on LBRY. It appears to have similar features for discovery, interaction, etc. as YouTube. Still testing it out personally to see how it actually performs though!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pumpsnabben@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

I use Odyssey most of the time, they make it very simple for creators to mirror their YouTube content so I like to support the ones who have.

[–] bledley@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Freetube if you want a standalone desktop app that stores all your subscriptions. Invidious instances in the browser. Newpipe on Android. All of these no ads and need no login. 😊

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dream_state@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Odyssee is the closest thing but I still mostly use YouTube with adblock

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wildchandelure@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You could try using an open-source client for YouTube. Like Freetube for pc, windows, and mac or Newport for Android. That's what I'm doing. Both of these don't use its API generally and you don't make an account on them. You can still access the content while having an app that works to get rid of ads entirely and without all the bloatware.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magikmw@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I know at least one creator that started posting to Utreon, both public and for paid tiers. I haven't went after them yet, but if Utreon would create something like Twitch Prime and pay creators for views, plus a bunch od other creators I follow would start posting there, I'd be happy to drop youtube for most dedicated (not-random-scroll-consumption) content. In favour of Utreon.

[–] Mononon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'm sure I'll get roasted for this, but just get YouTube Premium. As much content as people tend to consume on YT, I don't know why it's the only platform people seem so against paying for. YTP views are worth more to content creators. There's no ads. And you can't get YT music with it too. Honestly, it's just a massive amount of content and nothing even comes close. I know the joke is "who would pay for YT Premium", but l, at least in my house, it gets like 10x the use of Netflix and Hulu.

[–] xio@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The only problem with this is that more and more channels are adding native ads to their vids, and YT Premium doesn't bypass those ads

[–] FierroGamer@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's on the creators tho, not the platform I feel like it's not an argument against paying for the platform, at least not when there are plenty of videos that don't do baked in sponsor ads.

Edit: if you exclusively watch content with baked in ads, I can see it from a purely consumer end point of view.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

YTP views are worth more to content creators. There's no ads.

This is false, and I would argue that YTP generates significantly less revenue for content creators than even a dollar donation would over hundreds of videos.

YTP, when I had it, was still serving ads AND using trackers, which is not something I want to pay Google for.

For context, I have a YT channel with 3+ million views and tens of thousands of subscribers. YTP generates 1% of YouTube revenue, while ads make up the 99% difference.

Most people will have a handful of content creators that they regularly watch. If you took the YTP amount and split it between those creators as donations, you've made them far more than YouTube ads or YTP ever could.

That's my advice, as a content creator.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sadreality@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Frankly, there is nothing close to YouTube's scale.

It is the online teevee at its finest except google is already heading twitter and reddit route so people need to start supporting some competition.

Nebula and odysee appear to be the current available alternatives; however, i haven't tried them.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί