this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
-24 points (33.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35491 readers
347 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah - fuck Walmart in general.

But I'm confused. How is Verizon's misleading map Walmart's fault.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

OP might be inside a Walmart when they took the screenshot. Walmart either uses building materials that impede the signal or actively block it. I also can never get full 5G inside a Walmart, and sometimes I wonder if they are doing it on purpose to encourage using their local wifi. The only other time being inside a building messes with my phone is at the hospital, and I know they have a ton of equipment that could be responsible for that.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 months ago

I'd imagine that's part of it. But it's also a big metal building, farady cage and all.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Walmarts are big windowless boxes. A cell signal has to go through masonry walls to get out.

5G Ultra Wideband, which is what OP's map is showing to be in the area, and what he's upset about not getting, uses millimeter-wave frequencies, which are fast if they have a clear line to the tower...but don't penetrate material well.

https://www.5gamericas.org/here-comes-millimeter-wave/

On the challenging side of the equation, millimeter waves don’t propagate as far as low-band or mid-band signals, so there is a much smaller target area used to receive a signal, compared with sub-6 GHz signals. In addition, millimeter wave signals are subject to more diffused scattering when in contact with large objects, and they receive higher signal loss from foliage, object penetration, and from the atmosphere. This means you have to put a lot more millimeter wave signal repeaters around, so you get good mmWave coverage.

I suspect that if WalMart wants, they could maybe pay to run femtocells inside the store or something to get more coverage, but if (a) they already have 4G coverage in the store and (b) they're also providing WiFi access, they probably aren't gonna be putting even more network infrastructure in.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago

I get it bad in any large store, mainly because its a very large metal box. Its basically a faraday cage.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

This is more likely a coverage issue than Walmart illegally blocking wireless signals (per to FCC regulations).

Report the coverage issue to Verizon and your local Walmart. Both of which will want to increase coverage of where people are gathering. This is because if bad coverage areas are in places where people gather this will cause affected people to switch services or stop going to those gathering areas if there's alternatives.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

which FCC regulations in particular?

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right, I thought that might be what you were referring to. This is where we get into weeds technically:

Those regulations apply to active jamming, which is the use of an electronic device(s) to emit signals that interfere with lawfully approved channels. It is important to note that this holds no practical bearing upon structures as they by definition cannot engage in active jamming, only in passive blocking or coincidental interference.

What's being experienced with Walmart's lack of 5G is likely due to the fact that 5G does not penetrate walls very well. Combine this with the fact that you have hundreds of devices in the same enclosed space trying to talk to the same tower some miles away on the lower bandwidth 5G channel that can penetrate walls, and you can see how 5G access is effectively being "denied" simply by the nature of the business. Walmart could implement an on-premises 5G relay to solve the issue, but why would they want to take on that tech debt? All they are required to do by law is make sure E911 is not impeded by the building or operations of the business. They don't owe you access to other radio waves when on their premises.

If this regulation were to somehow be applied to passive blocking like what I've described, then Faraday cages would be illegal-- which aren't, again as long as E911 is not impeded. This would also make high security bamk vaults illegal due to the thick wall construction.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago
  1. OP mentioned this also happened outside in the parking lot and was implying active blocking.

  2. There's ways for stores to work with telecoms to get service broadcast inside the warehouse/building as well to get around the natural passive blocking from the building materials.

I was well aware of the difference between active and passive blocking.

[–] frosty@pawb.social 6 points 5 months ago

Haha. My partner has Verizon, and they have parts of Marlborough where it just completely cuts out. I know that Wal*mart, and it's just over the city line. AT&T is slightly better.

[–] onion@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is you 5G connection faster than 4G anyways? In my country you don't really get above 150Mb/s either way

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Significantly actually. In fact my home internet is also Verizon 5G, and I usually get about 300 down and 20 up. LTE is unusable at this point in my experience, which is weird to me, because it used to be the hotness.