this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
290 points (99.7% liked)

Steam

10215 readers
5 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ksynwa@lemmy.ml 84 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Pirate it. Simple as.Unless it has denuvo of course

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Require a PSN account? My first thought was "arrrrr, not I!"

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if this move will be a good incentive for pirating Sony's games... I guess we will find out.

[–] ksynwa@lemmy.ml 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For a live service game like Helldivers you could at least logically justify the account requirement but for an offline game like GoW it will just piss people.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

For a live service game like Helldivers you could at least logically justify the account requirement

Uhhhh what? No. The fact that it does not exist and has not existed for months shows that's it's not justifiable.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But you could come up with a believable reason for multiplayer. (Ex. Maybe the devs decided their servers wouldn't scale and had to move to Sony's, but those require users to have a Sony account.)

For single player, there's not even a hypothetical excuse. They just want you to be inconvenienced for their own gain.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My guy, the PSN requirement was suspended because it was causing server issues. You can use it RIGHT NOW without PSN...

There is no believable reason, that's why users were upset.

[–] ksynwa@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Not justifiable but one can weave some twisted logic to explain it. With single player games there is even less explanation.

[–] jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip 58 points 5 months ago (2 children)

wack, glad ratchet and clank came out before they decided to shoot themselves in the foot

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Could come in a future update

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago

And I could refund the game after a future update.

[–] NeryK@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Wonderful game, excellent port, no account or DRM or anticheat requirements... And yet it has abysmal sales on PC, go figure.

[–] Shialac@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago (4 children)

How do they justify some shitty account for an offline singleplayer game?

[–] lilja@lemmy.ml 26 points 5 months ago

Even single-player games aren't single-player anymore with all the online-requiring bullshit publishers have shoved into their games. The game most likely comes with a fuckton of telemetry and user-behaviour tracking which is a lot more valuable to Sony if it can be attached to a specific user.

[–] pro_grammer@programming.dev 14 points 5 months ago

"Fuck you", that's their argument

[–] szczuroarturo@programming.dev 6 points 5 months ago

The same way Ubisoft, EA or whoewer else has their own fancy launcher.

Its an incredibly stupid thing but unfortunetly nothing new

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

At least with ghost of tsushima you only needed an account for the online co-op mode.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 44 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Sony be losing their marrbles if they think PC player's won't disarrm this requirement quite arrbitrarily. The adventures of snarrling Kratos and his charrge Atreiu in Asgarrd will be played on PC with or without this farrce.

Also, I must also apologize for my grammarr. I find arrticulating parrticularly harrd.

[–] ForgottenUsername@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We ain't no filthy console peasants 🤣

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago

Nay. We be PC arristocracy!

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why did you say it like that?

[–] Robert7301201@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 months ago

I'll give you a hint: Arr!

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 40 points 5 months ago

No it wont 🏴‍☠️

[–] saddlebag@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There’s a fair amount of sailor talk around here. Any captains manage to get their booty to run on Linux? I tried ff7 remake to no avail

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Of course! If it has an installer, run it through Bottles first.

  • Mount the ISO file in KDE/GNOME
  • Create a new bottle in Bottles
  • Open the bottle and select the executable on the mounted ISO to start
  • When choosing an install directory, install to the Z: drive if possible so you don't have to look for the files in your Bottles prefix
  • Follow the installer normally

Once done, you can either start the game directly in Bottles or create a non-Steam shortcut in Steam and select the exe of the game you just installed.

I prefer running it through Steam because then I always have access to the latest Proton versions.

Didn't try FF7 but played Alan Wake 2 like this.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 12 points 5 months ago

Mm-hmm, I know some of these words...

[–] Gebruikersnaam@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've also noticed that for some repacks it is better to use a different runner to install and then switch to a gaming runner for running the game.

edit: kron4ek specifically

[–] ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub 19 points 5 months ago
[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Real talk what was the point of porting if they're still gonna force us to make another goddamn account for their shitty, annually-hacked launcher-adjacent-service? Fuckin keep it. Keep it and all the rest of 'em in the pipeline that Sony wants to stick their collective dick in before pushing to Steam.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

God dammit!

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Welp looks like I'm gonna have to miss that one then

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This is annoying in a way, but really, how is this any different than buying an EA or Ubisoft game on steam? I mean, besides that it’s actually a good game. This bullshit has been normalized for awhile and isn’t a surprise.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 65 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

how is this any different than buying an EA or Ubisoft game on steam?

Some of us don't buy that bullshit either.

This bullshit has been normalized for awhile

Only because people like yourself allow it to be.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gotta give it to EA and ubisoft tho, they really help me boycott them. I wish I could say it takes some effort to avoid their games or that I would buy them if they were good companies but damn, I don't think they released a single interesting game in the past 10 years

[–] turing_spider574@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

titanfall 2 (2016) is the only good game from EA in the last 10 years

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you guys all missed the implication that I think EA and Ubisoft games suck. Why am I buying games that suck?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your comment read like many I have seen in response, suggesting that "normal"= acceptable.

I don't really care if EA or Ubi games are good or not. In either case, the problem is not the game, it's the publisher.

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I could have worded that better.

I suppose I have accepted it as just the way it is and will be, which is a shame, but I don’t buy their products either. I would love to play the new God of War, but I don’t need to that badly. There’s plenty of other great games out there without this bullshit which I would rather support

[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I believe the issue is they are way more region limited and you could buy the game but not be able to access it due to that region limitation.

Could be wrong, all I know is from the hell divers chaos

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're delisting in regions without PSN. The irony of Helldivers is they backpedaled on PSN requirement but left it delisted in those countries. So people who already bought it can still play but new people can't buy, so the player base is steadily declining.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago

The irony of Helldivers is they backpedaled on PSN requirement but left it delisted in those countries

Because they're still planning to implement it

[–] Rose@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, the previous Sony games on PC can be bought anywhere in the world but in Russia, yet the latest cannot be purchased in 170 countries, including some EU members like Estonia and Lithuania.

[–] VeryImportantUser@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

how is this any different than buying an EA or Ubisoft game on steam?

Who says it is different? Some time ago, I wanted to buy South Park: The Fractured but Whole on Steam, but when I saw the Ubisoft account requirement, I immediately close the tab.

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

As you should, good job. I guess I failed to elaborate - I think unfortunately it will still sell very well, as has been demonstrated by other companies doing this. I don’t expect Sony to stop, they had the opportunity, are doubling down, and it does suck. I guess I have a hard time being outraged when really it’s nothing new. Same shit, different company.

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago

It isn’t, and shouldn’t be normalised but criticised. Yet people buy into this shit anyway