101
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by UlyssesT@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

Mine's a tie between a near future and a not so near future sci-fantasy bazinga take:

so-true "Self-driving cars are the key to a post-scarcity future!" (when asked how the fuck that conclusion was drawn, I was told "do the research.")

so-true "Even if climate change is proven to actually be a problem, climate doesn't matter in space. We can have fully sustainable cattle farms in orbit producing as much meat as we need. Elon Musk." (yes, that bazinga fuck actually said "Elon Musk" at the end of that claim like it somehow stamped a seal upon the rest of the take)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] supermangoman@hexbear.net 68 points 1 year ago

"Bernie can win" - me four years ago.

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago

"There is hope for the United States" - me four years ago

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

The biggest one is just the idea that the climate apocalypse can be meaningfully stopped. Like sorry, no, that window closed probably 20 years ago.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

A media-promoted take was about robots dumping ice cubes in the Arctic Ocean like a fucking Futurama bit. galaxy-brain

[-] aebletrae@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Greenland's way ahead of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Still, there's a fuckton of investment, organisation, and technology we should be working on to slow change and adapt to a different Earth that would save billions of lives. Sadly we're more busy spending billions on Twitter and luxury cars or whatever.

[-] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

That's everyone, I even see the same stuff here. No one wants to accept how bad the situation is.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

Slowing the inevitable ruination so we can live a bit longer is still possible, so at the least I'd push for that instead of "tech will fix it, this is fine" hopium or "nothing can be done, be a selfish asshole and try to shame people for caring, get schwifty" copium.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I fully believe both “We’re 100% absolutely fucked,” but also every 0.1 degree less warming means millions of deaths that don’t happen

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] let_me_tank_her@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago

Hillary is light itself was kinda out there. hillary-apartment

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, that one was public and amazing. agony-shrooms

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

It would be hard to believably satirise a yes-man of such devotion

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

The evergreen one in my mind that I got to dunk on the guy for was, "Joe Biden will fix student debt!"

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

"Joe Biden will fix student debt!"

Big "Evrart is helping me find my gun" energy, except it'd be like Evrart was the one that personally stole his gun to begin with. tequila-sunset evrart

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

"Gay people only exist in the west"

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

I heard a whopper to top that one, and worse, it's from my own biological family:

"Gay people are just lazy. Men always want to fuck, so the ones that are (nazi slur here) just fuck each other." scared-fash

[-] Bobson_Dugnutt@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

I heard a self professed communist say that BDSM only exists in the west

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Every ideology is extremely weird about sex, but it sucks seeing leftists deciding that people's consensual sexual preferences are bad and then dying on that hill. It's so easy to just let people be weird, but so many people want to harass people who enjoy sex differently than they do.

[-] ElGosso@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Yup, no shibari bondage or anything like that side-eye-2

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

Man I'm not even vegan, but cattle farms in orbit is peak carnist nonsense

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

We can have fully sustainable cattle farms in orbit producing as much meat as we need

WTF the so-true take is supposed to be that we'll all live in giant self-sufficient skyscrapers that grow made-to-order beef in bioreactors, not animal agriculture in space! warf-wtf

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

we'll all live in giant self-sufficient skyscrapers that grow made-to-order beef in bioreactors

Bazingas have slid rightward on the Overton window to the point that synthetic meat isn't "based" enough and the cruelty's the point to them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago
  • NATO is a defensive alliance

  • Whatever variations on the theme of streamerbros assuring their audience that they don't need to do the reading ("Just watch my streams where I skim Wikipedia and provide a terminally-online westoid hot take instead - you're actually the smart one because you don't even need to read a book; your opinions are always correct by default! Now that you're sufficiently flattered send me a superchat, you filthy little paypiggies!!")

  • You can't judge historical figures by today's moral standards (Often used to run defence for slave-owning US politicians oblivious to the fact that there were people, including political philosophers, of the same era who denounced slavery. Also, fuck you, I'm going to judge people by today's moral standards and there's nothing you can do to stop me.)

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

The "Can't judge history by modern standards" take is asinine because new information frequently alters or outright negates old information. Asbestos was once regarded as safe for use as insulation, for instance, but as time went on it was determined that it caused mesothelioma. As a consequence, asbestos is no longer regarded as safe by most.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

It's also a weird sort of historical revisionism because it implicitly assumes that people in the past were one homogeneous blob which all shared in the identical set of moral standards.

Like, at which point in time did everyone unanimously agree upon moral standards again? Remind me.

Not to mention the fact that it's inherently classist and racist; it might have been considered "moral" to incite pogroms against Jewish people in European history but... that's only according to the people who held the most influential positions in politics and philosophy. You can't tell me that the family of Jewish people who had to flee their village because they risked getting lynched were like:

"This is a terrible tragedy that has befallen us and we have lost everything. However it should be noted that, on the other hand, it is entirely morally-justified."

So when people talk about the moral standards of history, they're talking about the moral standards of those who held hegemonic power over society (and that basically means wealthy white men) to the exclusion of everyone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

North Korea actually doesn't have nukes

[-] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

After only their first test, which was like a 0.5-2kt yield, I can understand this claim somewhat. They could have faked that as a bluff with lots of conventional explosives. Doesn't make so much sense why they would, but it was a plausible interpretation I guess.

Given that their later tests were something like a hundred times that, it's kinda absurd to still try to make the claim

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

I think libs think of the DPRK as a project of enormous effort to give the illusion of functionality from the last 3 remaining north koreans.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

fuck-around moment waiting to happen.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

"Self-driving cars are the key to a post-scarcity future!" (when asked how the fuck that conclusion was drawn, I was told "do the research.")

It's really simple.

Once everyone owns a self-driving car then they will be able to rent out their car as a self-driving taxi to everyone else, thus generating a perpetual cycle of passive income for everyone, at which point we will have achieved a post-scarcity future because everyone will be able to afford everything.

Dumb tankies call themselves materialists and they can't even figure this out themselves smh.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GarfieldYaoi@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I zero in on housing, and NIMBY liberals are their own unique brand of annoying:

"Anyone who's white should move out of cities in blue states and StAy AnD fIgHt in the red states they came from. Wait, what's an invisible minority? Why am I not moving to red states?" Well, ummmm....."

"Stop being entitled and stay in your suburb in the boonies, no one owes you a city life!" (The nanosecond they have something, they start doing the whole bootstraps thing)

"We appreciate that you're trying to save the world, but go save the world somewhere else." an actual quote. They know building more housing is the right thing to do, but they're invested in real estate.

"Just move to Texas/the midwest, bro."

"There's plenty of housing, just please PLEASE live in the boring suburbs in bumfuck nowhere far away from me! Sure, I'll call you redneck trash for doing so, but I need you there so I can have someone to feel superior to!" (not an actual quote, obviously. But this is sort of how they think)

A lot of lib NIMBYism boils down to trying to keep blue cities in blue states as exclusive as possible. Yeah, the dems suck ass, but if I could afford to, I would have fucked off to San Francisco a long time ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NoLeftLeftWhereILive@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago
[-] NoLeftLeftWhereILive@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Also:

"AI is the greatest advancement for democracy."

Heard in the wild from a tech guy a few years ago after Elmo had bought some AI language translation firm and announced it makes "information accessible for all". He was hyped, hyped for it.

A few months ago he told me that AI will destroy the world and spesifically his job.

Haven't asked him how he thinks all this is going recently because can't handle the takes anymore.

[-] poppy_apocalypse@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

"Manchin will vote with democrats on important shit." Lib defending his vote to confirm Kavanaugh

[-] Phish@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is good because people from (list of countries the US has either bombed or sanctioned to shit) envy our poor!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
101 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22694 readers
399 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS