this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
319 points (96.2% liked)

Comics

5878 readers
334 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
319
Free Speech (lemmy.ml)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/comics@lemmy.ml
 
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

In the context of US constitutional law, yes. But freedom of speech can have a wider meaning in moral philosophy. What someone might mean when they speak of the idea will vary.

Anyway, I don’t think anyone has an obligation to listen to or host content they find offensive or harmful, but in the context of a public forum that hosts a wide range of non-curated content and discourse, removing content or banning people just because it is critical of you or you disagree with it may be morally wrong. Especially when there are clearly outlined rules and the content does not clearly violate those rules. This happens frequently on this instance (and others, but this seems to be the main offender among the big instances currently).

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

That'll always come down to the moderation team and their views of content, and it'll always be a thing in online forums. I can still remember the, ahem, other place, and their mods on a power trip were legendary for stifling conversation points they disagreed with. Same thing happened on Digg before that.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They know this because they people crying about the first amendment and "cancel culture" are consistently the ones doing it to others.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wait, it's all projection?

🌏 πŸ‘¨β€πŸš€ πŸ”« πŸ‘©β€πŸš€

Always has been.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Freedom of Speech != Obligation to Listen

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

You’re free to be an ass and I’m free to call you one.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

I've been shown so many doors, you'd think I wouldn't need to be shown anymore, but here we are.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

It is worth remembering: any law reflects the moral right to free expression. There are limits - there are always limits - but you are correct to have some expectations of leeway, anywhere you go.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

right-wing libertarian philosophy