this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
917 points (97.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5722 readers
3446 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 66 points 4 months ago (3 children)

coöperate – we used to have a diaeresis on the second ‘o’ to indicate a second syllable (and to make it clear we weren’t talking about barrel making) but then we decided we hated accent marks …

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 44 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Typesetters decided we hate accent marks

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The New Yorker would like to have a word.

[–] NucleusAdumbens@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They throw umlauts around like they're going out of style

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Gotta use these things up guys

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Typesetters were right.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As a German, it's a welcome change.

Imagine your head automatically pronouncing the "ö" of coöperate like this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-mid_front_rounded_vowel

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago

the pain of being nordic/german, you're utterly incapable of taking anglophone metal albums seriously

"motörhead", yeah sure, mote 'er head

[–] alien@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

bring back accent marks!!

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 52 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that right in the definition of the word? They co-operate to form a word.

Cooperating means working together to accomplish a goal, sometimes by doing different tasks; not necessarily just doing the same thing and duplicating effort, as would be the case if they made the same sound.

If anything, we should be casting shade at that lazy hyphen who ducked out early instead of sticking around to make the etymology clear.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cooperating, to make a barrel.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

That one took me a moment... 😁

[–] Geek_King@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

As a native english speaker, english is stupid.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 35 points 4 months ago (2 children)

All languages are stupid. Japanese has 3 different scripts, with the kanji having made up characters that don't even mean anything. Chinese has a coherent grammatically poem where every word is just shi making "Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" look like child's play. Romance languages felt it necessary to give every noun a gender that you have to memorize, and German decided that wasn't complicated enough so they added a third gender. Welsh and Gaelic use the latin alphabet, but just made up their own rules so the language doesn't sound anything at all the way it looks to other languages that use the Latin alphabet.

All languages are messy and illogical since they evolve over time to accommodate the needs of the speakers at any given time, and then you end up with weird holdovers that no longer make sense, but that's just how things are done so we keep doing it that way. Artificial languages have been created to maintain a logic, but no one uses them, and if they were adopted universally they would lose that logic as people use the languages in ways that were never intended.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's the whole reason science stuff tends to use latin as much as possible. It's a dead language that is relatively easy to learn, but won't evolve over time as no one is casually using it.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Scientific terms describe very specific things in a very specific way. It's the "no one's casually using it" part that keeps it more consistent, not the origin of the terms themselves.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

Show me any science paper that is using latin outside of scientific names of animals or anatomy. No one is publishing their research in Latin

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Hey, the three Japanese script make actual sense though.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As a native Slavic language speaker, wanna trade your tense system for our noun cases?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My native has 19 cases with 2-3 variations of each for vowel harmony. Plus verbs are partially conjugated for both the subject and the object, so I see you, you see me, they see it are all one word sentences each, just conjugated differently. I see myself is a two word sentence though, with both words conjugated.Other simple sentences are also collapsed into conjugation hell, "You could take me home" is one such heavily conjugated word.

But no genders, and only two and a half temporal tenses, and pronunciation is directly matched to text, no pronunciation guides or spelling bees.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

As an attentive English student, I must disagree.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

And yet they exist side by side in the same word. Pretty much the definition

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't prevent them from working together.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Unity in Diversity

[–] f314@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Historically you would use the umlaut (lit. re-sound in German) to signify that both vowels are pronounced separately and not as a diphthong! I think some publications, like The New Yorker, are pretentious enough to still use it.. In this case, cooperate would be spelled coöperate.

Edit: Oops! Meant to reply to Geek_King

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That's extremely pretentious, I'm impressed!

[–] wonderfulvoltaire@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] urda@lebowski.social 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ope just gonna sneak right past ya

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] wonderfulvoltaire@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Ope gonna give it to ya

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

Anyone else occasionally pronounce it like the "cuperate" in recuperate

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Anyone get stuck and confused by "insisted"?

[–] lath@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You mean like step-sister stuck or two different vowels gaining sentience and expressing themselves stuck?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

What did he eat now? Did he get into my Pop Tarts again?