this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23286 readers
137 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CNN — AI images have become an unavoidable roadside attraction on Facebook and other social media, where dramatic and outlandish depictions of emotional scenes lure users into doling out likes, shares and “Amens.”

Among the funhouse images of fake children crying in the street and police officers saving inexplicably huge Bibles from the rain, countless depictions of Jesus Christ seem to take up an outsized amount of AI real estate.

It makes sense. The central figure of Christianity invokes potent reactions from billions of followers around the globe. For the last 2,000 years, faithful hands have labored to create likenesses of their professed savior, projecting onto him various theologies and mythologies combined with aesthetics of the time: Jesus suffering on the cross, Jesus as the Good Shepherd, Jesus the creator of miracles, Jesus the word made flesh, Jesus as cosmic judge.

Now, in the age of AI, Jesus can assume an infinite variety of roles with just a few keystrokes. Jesus as a durian fruit, for instance. Or Jesus battling shirtless with Satan. Sometimes, Jesus is cuddling a person in need in a hospital bed, his chiseled features and strong hands providing divine comfort.

None of these things are in the Bible, but they are alive in the minds of particularly imaginative Christians, or just those who want some easy engagement on Facebook.

What’s unsettling is how many AI-created images of Jesus are unnecessarily handsome and rugged, like one of those Instagram influencers who wears a lot of pendants and is always wandering barefoot through an island jungle.

There’s nothing wrong with that, per se. The Bible doesn’t get specific about Jesus’ looks, and certainly artists over the millennia have taken creative license when it comes to his physique (and, to a different point, his skin tone).

However, generative AI, like the kind that can create images from text prompts, doesn’t work like an artist’s brain. All of these handsome AI Jesus images are created from patterns a machine picks up from the information it is fed. What does that say about us, and how we view the figures most important to our cultural identities?

wasn't there c/the_dunk_tank posts about this lmao

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They turned Gigachad into Jesus noooooo ooooooooooooooh

^ Someone made this exact same image for Facebook back in 2013 without AI.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

Somebody invented time travel. Holy smokes!

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] da_gay_pussy_eatah@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

pretty sure they pulled this guy out of the rubble of an elementary school in Gaza

[–] stigsbandit34z@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Exactly what happens when a nation steeped in Christian theocratic bullshit starts going all in on predictive image and text

Who could’ve seen this coming

amerikkka

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

being a carpenter in the days before pickup trucks made you extremely ripped

[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

I thought the thumbnail was Gale from Waterdeep

[–] asante@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

well this makes the "Jesus is a white man" idea a whole lot harder to dispel if a tool for mass creating images won't do otherwise

algorithmic bias is a pretty huge issue with AI in general. not looking too good for BIPOC either

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

Obvious as it might be to say, we desire what we lack.