106

Republicans, in one of the more moronic takes of the election season, say that if Biden is too old to run for office, then he's too old to hold the office and should resign.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 135 points 3 months ago

I'm in favor of Biden resigning, if for no other reason than to make Kamala Harris the 47th President and make Trump reprint all of his "45-47" hats.

[-] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 78 points 3 months ago

This is the only argument that made me reconsider my position.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm in favour just because I am pretty damned sure they don't realize this would allow Kamala to have a short track record and point to it as a "trial run" showing how qualified she is

EDIT: Spelling Error

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I'm baffled. Just having her do speeches as president gives her massive credibility to the voters.

Unless their plan is to goad her into it then call her a power hungry traitor who stole the presidency I guess. But even for them it seems like a tough sell.

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago

If he stepped down, Kamala would be president for a few months, thus giving America a small taste of what her presidency looks like

This would backfire big time for the GoP since it would allow her to flex a bit

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sorry, I was pointing out the spelling error. I should have been more clear.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

Oh damn, thanks for pointing that out!

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 10 points 3 months ago

Sweat shops in China be scrambling

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 103 points 3 months ago

Who the fuck said he's too old to hold office?

Joe Biden is too old to win our bullshit popularity competition of an election - he can do the job just fine.

Similarly, I'm an ace of a senior developer, but drawing out a complex algorithm on a white board will stop dumb companies from ever hiring me.

[-] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Bold of you to assume they're attempting to make an argument in good faith in any capacity

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Why would that stop them from hiring you?

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 35 points 3 months ago

It's mostly newer programmers who remember how to design a complex algorithm on the fly because these are taught in college and then used as study tools to land a job. Over the past decade or so, software companies started requiring these algorithm tests during interviews. More senior developers don't want to go back and study for something that really won't do much to help them at all, except in interviews.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

So very true. It's designed to be a nudge-nudge, wink-wink way of carrying out the ageism.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think it comes more down to the fact that companies want an easy way to get butts in seats at the lowest cost possible. Including these silly tests eliminates most of your candidates, making your job of filling those seats much easier. And, conveniently enough, the people who pass tend to cost less! Imagine that.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I also think they want more gullible, naive and pliable workers. People that won't ask any difficult questions and go along with all the happy horseshit that corps like to sling. These tend to be younger.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Part of the reason for such performative job hiring shenanigans is to have an excuse for ageism.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There’s stupid and then there’s Republican. And this is coming from the party that is falling in line behind an incoherent, dementia-ridden, treasonous pedophile.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago
  • felon, rapist, and sexual assault perpetrator.
[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago

34 time felon and add racist in there

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I fucking WISH he convicted of being a racist, but that is unfortunately not a crime.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago

Apparently the Republicans just can't wait for Harris to be the first black woman to be President.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 months ago

It'd fuck up their stupid 45-47 hats.

[-] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago

This is almost petty enough to be appealing, haha.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

It would be churlish not to oblige them

[-] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

Personally I'd rather she be elected in the General. Won't leave an asterisk that they'll always point to because the first woman president was "handed" it by a man.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Solid thinking.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

We'd be talking for a long time if this was a conversation about how we wish things were 😅

[-] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago

And, since she assumed the role after hallway through the term, she could still run for president twice more, serving over two terms.

Incumbents always have an advantage in elections.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Just in time for her to use the new monarchical powers, too. Shame they just don't think.

These magats just can't stand to hear anything but themselves speak and will say anything as long as they get to talk.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago

Good.

Kamala becomes President and has unlimited powers thanks to their hand picked Court.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

I can think of a few "official acts" she can order.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

With her history of criminal justice and with the support of the law and order party there should be no problem putting away a convicted felon now running for president

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Official act. Imprison in concrete block.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

Especially if she has "offical acts" engraved on a sword.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Upper decker on the way out?

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Haha, fuckoff GQPers

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

As someone hoping he would bow out of the race: fuck you, Republicans. He was elected. He will serve the term he was elected for. Nobody at any point was pushing for him to resign from office.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Still, I'd like to see the look on their faces when it dawns on them that Kamala will be their President and THEY ASKED FOR IT. 🤣

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago

Resigning helps make the case for a replacement now, say his health has declined and he the nation is bigger than one man.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 14 points 3 months ago

That turtle mother fucker first.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That would be some next level fuckery there, lol. Get Moscow Mitch to step down first, then, okay, Biden steps down. Then they learn that they will have a girl boss who is a POC and that all that stupid magamerchandise is worthless and donnie will have to sell them more.

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago

good...yes! keep the focus on Biden. thanks republicans

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Because they love Harris so much?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Bad strategy, in my opinion. Most (relatively) apolitical people are going to look at what Biden did and think it was a selfless and humble act. They look like spoiled children. I guess it's not a strategy, it's a bunch of babies lashing out.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They had this planned since last week. F em.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Now see this one I think that, while probably a good idea objectively, isn't one that he should cave into if only because fuck the Republicans. Those guys are dicks.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
106 points (89.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS