this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
1061 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2477 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 405 points 5 months ago (35 children)

"There is a strong sense by many in the Democrat Party - namely Barack Hussein Obama - that Kamala Harris is a Marxist fraud who cannot beat President Trump, and they are still holding out for someone 'better.' Therefore, it would be inappropriate to schedule things with Harris because Democrats very well could still change their minds," the statement said.

This is a statement from a presidential campaign.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 136 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The quote should be put with spoiler tags and a surgeon general's warning that reading the contents has been shown to lower your IQ by at least four percentage points, and prolonged exposure to even seeing the words on the screen could cause permanent brain damage.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's okay I already have permanent brain damage, I can translate for everyone.

It says,

Donald Trump is tired of changing his pants every time someone mentions debating Harris, so we respectfully decline.

Thank you,

Your future inmate president.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Implying Trump changes when he shits himself is far too generous. People literally say he smells of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 87 points 5 months ago (2 children)

am I reading this right? Republicans are saying that Obama thinks Kamala Harris is too Marxist to beat Trump?

what, and I cannot stress this enough:

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What if she started roasting things. Completely breaking down the things they say in front of a whiteboard. I want that to be her entire campaign just... Letting them talk and then talk about it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Their campaign is literally saying shit that I would normally expect to hear from the mouths of 3rd world dictators. The GOP is now conspiracy theory bullshit from stem to stern.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cocaine induced circle jerk

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DBT@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s wild how frequently they just… make shit up and say it like it’s factual.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 244 points 5 months ago (19 children)

Brave Sir Donald ran away.

Bravely ran away away.

When danger reared it's ugly head,

He bravely turned his tail and fled.

Yes, brave Sir Donald turned about

And gallantly he chickened out.

Gingerly taking to his feet,

He beat a very brave retreat.

Bravest of the brave, Sir Donald!

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 146 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If it was any other, normal country, the debate schedule would not be based on whether someone wants to show up or not.

If a canditate doesn't show up, the other candidate gets to talk about their campaign.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 47 points 5 months ago (11 children)

The US is bizarro world in so many aspects. Political Supreme Court appointees that are appointed for life (!), two party system, the electoral college, the absurdly long election cycles...

[–] wieson@feddit.org 31 points 5 months ago

The fact that the first lady does speeches and the presidents family is in the spotlight at all. (Rather dynastic for a democracy)

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 140 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Trump is a PUSSY

BOK BOK BOK 🐓🍗🐔

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He's such a giant pussy that he can't debate Harris because he'll be furiously grabbing himself for the foreseeable future.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 115 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

a felon running away from a prosecutor

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why did trump cross the road?

To get away from the prosecutor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 95 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Coward, pedophile, felon, traitor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 83 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well he's not wrong, in the end. Televising the brutal beating of a handicapped old man would be pretty inappropriate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 73 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Who here had him backing out of deba...oh, most everyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 65 points 5 months ago (7 children)

His supporters will require Olympic level mental gymnastics to dispel the unease they're gonna get if they even hear about this. Backing down from a debate looks cowardly no matter what his lame excuse and they'll feel the truth of that.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're going to do everything they can to paint Kamala as an illegitimate candidate, and spin his refusal to debate her as simply refusing to legitimize her.

Trump's base doesn't know shit about fuck, so if their god emperor says she's illegitimate they won't even think about it further.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 5 months ago

trump has never had luck going against a prosecutor

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago

because he is too old to debate with Harris

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 57 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yes, it would be inappropriate for Harris to fight a battle of wits against an unarmed man.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If your platform and policy are good, you can debate anyone at any time. If your platform is just “other guy bad” then you’re gonna have a hard time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

The well-documented cowardice of this geriatric and demented rapist insurrectionist.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They’re still blowing that dog whistle with Obama’s middle name. For fuck’s sake, grow up!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 49 points 5 months ago

What a pussy.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Even if Trump says no, Harris should at the very least discuss her opinions and views on camera. It could just be a single person question and answering, a debate other Democrats, or debating a third party candidtae if they don't want to back other Democrat candidates. Leaving Harris a mystery is the worst thing Democrats can do.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!”

…..but, talk to Kamala Harris about policies and record?

*flee

Coward. Total and utter chickenshit.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

She was a fucking DA, ain't nobody wanna debate with her, especially a half brained real-estate broker

[–] Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Lots of talented people would look forward to debating with a worthy opponent. It’s a challenge. An opportunity to rise up, prove yourself.

Trump isn’t one of those people lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 43 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He just doesn't want to talk to her without a lawyer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 43 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I would put so many commercials out there on fox "news" and everywhere else calling out Dementia Don for being scared and too weak to debate her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

Because he doesn't like to get his ass handed to him by a smarter woman.

[–] Dreamless4561@sh.itjust.works 41 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Kamala Harris is the candidate. Everyone knows it, including him. He's just scared

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (17 children)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He is afraid of strong, smart women. He is afraid of people who can laugh. And he is deadly afraid of ending up losing the debate and the vote to a black woman, the kind of person that should in his mind be as inferior as a bug.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Felon, pedophile, rapist, coward.

There are so many ways to describe this man

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 34 points 5 months ago (3 children)

"Inappropriate" ?

How about after August 1, when she's officially nominated? Will it still be "inappropriate" to debate her then?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 242@lemmy.cafe 32 points 5 months ago

Didn't he just say the other day that he wanted to debate her multiple times? Don't tell us that was a weak ass lie Donnie! (We already know it was).

[–] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 29 points 5 months ago

i agree it would be inappropriate

why would a politician debate with a convicted felon

load more comments
view more: next ›