279
Because it's fore-fathers ya dolt! Do I have to explain everything?
I also appreciated this particular nugget in the article:
While Harris has not personally given birth, neither has any other occupant of the White House.
While Harris has not personally given birth, neither has any other occupant of the White House
Though LBJ once came close after a particularly hearty meal, according to an aide who was present at the meeting
Doesn't the entire first family live in the White House? Not to mention servants and the like. I get what they're going for, but occupant is one of the few words they could have chosen that could not be more inaccurate.
Did they play golf or something?
Because for the standard conservative there are only two genders, Penis and Baby-Machine
Explains why so many of them are dicks.
Also fun fact: those aren't mutually exclusive either! One can be both a baby machine and a dick!
Also sheds light on their fixation on penises as well. The whole 'buying a big truck to make up for smol pp' is a very conservative tradition
I was in a Bluegrass duo called Penis & Baby Machine. We were wildly popular in the Appalachians until someone leaked to the press that we weren't blood related.
Didn’t you have that hit “No Pants Vance Lance the Couch Dance”
Nope, never happened! And if it did, it wasn't based on a true story! hides big dollar sign sack of hush money with a tag that says "smooches from Vansey xoxo
Because she's a woman, female, and as far as the right is concerned, her sole purpose in life (besides serving under the men in her life) is to bear children. They think women are breeding cattle, property of the primary man of their life.
It’s why they hate abortion. It’s like putting your dollar in the vending machine and the baby doesn’t come out.
Attacking the 'childless' is just another front of their culture war.
In another Lemmy post highlighting an article where Pete Buttigieg says America is ready for a gay man to be Vice President, I made this comment:
Still waiting for Americans to be ready for a Trans Atheist Single Childless Woman of Color President.
Obviously, this statement is, at least somewhat, hyperbole, but I made that statement to point out that I'm waiting for us all to grow the fuck up. Until we are able to accept and nurture a society that would willingly elect a Trans Atheist Single Childless Woman of Color as President of the United States Of America, based off of what they can contribute back to humanity as a whole (or, at the very least, I guess the nation state of the USA), then we truly are more akin to a bunch of high schoolers playing a popularity contest for who gets the nuclear access codes than adults participating in a mature and healthy electoral process.
Still waiting for Americans to be ready for a Trans Atheist Single Childless Woman of Color President
Tbh, I'd settle for either one, or even a religious person who keeps their religion out of their politics, including speeches.
As long as that person was also good at the job and had good policy priorities, of course.
what they can contribute back to humanity as a whole
You really are right about this, we want good leaders with good plans. Humans, who can be humans. If we can elect religious folks (Biden) who don't push that everyone must be that (I don't feel that he has), it is just the same with a "Trans Atheist Single Childless Woman of Color" because of that same thing. It's good to have diverse leadership. It seems that some of these hate groups are wrapped up in believing something like if we let one in, we let them all in. We're all here, together, and it can be fine.
it isn't
Wait till they hear about James Buchanan who was childless and likely gay
Lindsay Graham has entered the chat
It’s not. The media needs something to talk about
Because, woman. In the land of the free.
Because she's not them.
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
279 points (94.6% liked)
politics
19138 readers
3354 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS