this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
1847 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

5433 readers
2972 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 182 points 3 months ago (6 children)

This is one of the supposed benefits of the free market. If left alone, under normal conditions, what's supposed to happen is that badly ran, uncompetitive firms end up showing themselves the door, making room for new market competitors who may not be so badly managed. Don't fucking save them, especially don't advocate for saving them if you claim to love free markets.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The problem with free markets is they are incredibly unstable and create booms and busts and people don't like this so we get the worst of all worlds which is unfettered capitalism and no competition or failure weeding out poorly managed companies. Maybe free markets are just a shitty ideal?

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe free markets are just a shitty ideal?

Yes. The answer to that question is yes. Free market capitalism encourages cutthroat competition in which the only factor in any decision-making process is maximizing profits. Safety isn't a factor. Employee well-being isn't a factor. National security isn't a factor. The economy at large isn't a factor. Long term investments aren't even a factor. Line go up this quarter equals good quarter. Regulations ensure mandatory minimums for societal prosperity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, but the big players have their hands tied up in Congress and the military so much that it's not gonna happen.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Then they should be nationalized, because they've already got the benefits, but none of the downsides, while the public get none of the benefits, and all of the downsides... At this point "too big to fail" are essentially critical government infrastructure setup by wealthy criminals to steal directly from tax payers.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Nationalizing industries? In America? We don't do that here, friend. We give corporations massive bailouts and forgive all felonies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Album@lemmy.ca 147 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Look I'm fine if the govt wants to say a particular corporation is too big to fail. But trying to let that company remain private is not how too big to fail works. If you want a bailout, the govt owns your company, and the govt is obliged to maintain ownership for as long as it's deemed too big to fail...e.g. critical to national interests.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Personally I think all publicly traded companies should be partly owned by the people... Like sure you can have an IPO, and still make a zillion dollars... But society automatically owns a large enough share that you have to check with us before doing anything drastic

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PolyLlamaRous@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm so sick of companies pissing away all of their profit and money to make rich people richer then when the smallest problem hits it is our problem. We pay. Fuck them.

Looking at this (below) with some super sloppy math they have made in the last ten years 25 billion in profits and 5 billion in losses totally 20 billion in profits (give or take as my interest in totalling this accurately is zero). The fact that they used their money irresponsibly and didn't say for a raining day, or it's raining planes day, is not the tax payers that need to save them. I'm in my mid 30s, you know how many times I've seen extremely profitable and successful "too big to fail" businesses bailed out. Fuck the fucking fuckers and anyone who trys and correct my math.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BA/boeing/gross-profit

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just-restrained-enough fact-based rage is damn sexy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Between 1998 and 2018, the plane manufacturer also manufactured a whopping $61.0 billion in stock buybacks, amounting to 81.8 percent of its profits. Add in dividends and Boeing's shareholders received 121 percent of its profits.

Stock buybacks should be illegal or at least heavily regulated. They're stealing money from their employees, putting their company in peril by not having cash on hand, and stunting innovation. Imagine if major companies had to put profit back into their company? Instead it's a game to see how much you can exploit the working class, how little you can innovate and still get by (it's easy when you have no competition), and gamble (after lobbying with minimal money) that your political plants will force the taxpayers you're exploiting to bail you out. It's pretty disgusting.

https://greenalphaadvisors.com/boeings-struggles-highlight-the-perils-of-stock-buybacks/

https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/ba/buybacks#google_vignette --> they're still doing it as of March of this year.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 81 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it is of national importance, then let’s nationalize it

[–] Zorg@lemmings.world 27 points 3 months ago

That would make a lot of sense ...until we're reminded that USA is a kleptocracy, masquerading under a thick coating of we the people, freedom!™, liberty and justice for ~~all~~a select group of people. Then it becomes clear the obvious and only solution, is for the government to pump a couple billions into Boeing.

[–] microphone900@lemmy.ml 68 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe Boeing should have thought of that before making poor decisions. It should learn a little something called personal responsibility and if it goes broke, well, that'll be a shame. Anyway!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

If Boeing had just put a few dollars a week into a savings account when it was 18, it could have retired by now.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Boeing stopped pulling on its bootstraps and wants government welfare.

[–] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait to see another multi-billion dollar corporation get bailed out while I still don't have health insurance, and I'm still paying off credit card debt from during the Pandemic when the government gave people a measly $2400 over two years but handed out PPP loans and forgiveness to anyone that asked.

Fuck this country makes me ashamed to be a veteran.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (6 children)

there's a long, proud tradition in this country of screwing over veterans starting in 1776

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 53 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Capitalists: Under capitalism inefficient companies fail, and this is good.

Also capitalists: Save Boeing!!!11oneone

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Liome@pawb.social 47 points 3 months ago

Oww, poor litlle boeing, not having enough money :C
Maybe they would still have some, if they didn't pay hitmen, they probably don't come cheap.
Let 'em die. No, fine them even more, and lock up the management.

[–] IagreetotheTOS@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If a for-profit company needs to be rescued they usually shouldn’t be rescued.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

oh, I see how it is, you want poor American workers to lose their jobs, eh? now give us money fucking slave.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We could take all the theoretical bailout money and just give it to the newly unemployed workers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] experbia@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

deprivatize the aerospace industry. imagine the boon to the American economy if these failing, debt-ridden, dysfunctional aerospace manufacturers and airlines were replaced by a massive jobs program with the goal of optimizing air travel safety, affordability, and access. we're a big country. we could massively benefit from an aeronautical empire that gives any person safe, enjoyable 30 dollar flights, coast to coast.

(edit, oops, forgot a prefix. wow)

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but only after we fix the rail system first.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Government: It's too big to fail!

Me: The last time you said that the Banks you bailed out made record profits.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Boeing now officially top buy, inverse Cramer is a valid Strat

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fuck Jim Cramer by the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

here's some bootstraps mate, good luck!

also get fucked. what needs to be saved is the people from your utter disregard for human life.

you should use the last bit of your money to fly your CEO and entire management on one of your shitty planes and watch them fly through whatever fucking hole inevitably opens up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 3 months ago

Boeing, and anyone like them, NEEDS to fail.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

Hrmm... I miss the part where that's my problem.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe boeing needs to die so it can be replaced with something that does a better job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Hey Boeing, welcome to capitalism!

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have to laugh while dying a little inside when 'free market' people cry about banks, insurance companies, real estate, and other mega corps 'needing' bailouts.

Isn't that the essence of the free market? If companies suck shit, they die. The American people need a fucking bailout right now before another international corporation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess it's time for them to break up the company and sell to others who can pick up the reins and rebuild. They made this bed. The shareholders have made their money for years and years at a cost of human lives as seen time and time again. The shareholders could always pay back the formerly ever increasing dividends they have reaped over the past 10 years if they want to bail out the company they own.

No more taxpayer bailouts for the ownership class.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.

Fuck Boeing and Jim Cramer, especially.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 months ago (7 children)

As a big fan of capitalism - go die Boeing. It's not the taxpayers job to bail you out because of stupid decision you made.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I love this comments section.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Structured bankruptcy is not the cataclysmic event CEOs and major shareholders want you to believe.

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I know a startup that declared bankruptcy and "sold" to another organization... owned by the startup holders... to avoid paying debt.

It's all a game to take more money out of taxpayers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

"We moved all our production to non union factories across the country and put out shittier products, now we can't pay bills anymore!!"

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

With everything I know about Jim Cramer, that means Boeing is doing great and I should probably invest in it now

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nationalise it if it’s too big to fail but can no longer operate as a public company.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did they try not cutting costs to the point planes fall out of the sky?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

Did they try pulling themselves up by their bootstraps?

[–] gearheart@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Keep in mind the "company" might run out of money.

This does not mean the CEO's and higher ups don't get their 100 million$$ paycheck.

If those paychecks were proportional the company would have money and record profits again.

That + bailout means CEO and share members get major pay

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Golden parachutes should be illegal.

load more comments
view more: next ›