107
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 83 points 2 weeks ago

in communist north korea you are only allowed to vote for the ruling party

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 80 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalist countries don't have democracy

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 73 points 2 weeks ago

What do you mean?

I can go down to the booth on election day and vote for the candidates the government said it was okay for me to vote for and then get a sticker that says "I voted!" on it

If that's not democracy I will eat one of my many hats

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 42 points 2 weeks ago

i-voted

porky-happy Thank you for your consent! mission-accomplished-1mission-accomplished-2

[-] sweatersocialist@hexbear.net 61 points 2 weeks ago

i live in GA, i was gonna vote PSL under no delusion that they would win. that's how most people view the campaign and how the campaign even sells its self. the election is more about building the movement to try and win future elections. so why would this make leftists here suddenly vote for kdolf hitler? now i'm just not gonna vote lol.

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 43 points 2 weeks ago

Go in and draw a pigpoop on the ballot.

[-] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 32 points 2 weeks ago

What's stopping you from just writing them in anyway?

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago
[-] booty@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

I mean it doesn't really matter what hoops they do or don't jump through, im casting my vote for my preferred candidate. If they don't provide a box for that I'm writing it in big characters diagonally across the entire ballot. My vote was never gonna mean anything anyway why would I care whether the illegitimate system thinks my vote is legitimate

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 53 points 2 weeks ago

back-to-me

And where did that bring you?

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago

Atlanta Journal-Constitution article

ATLANTA (AP) — A judge ruled Monday that four independent and third-party candidates are ineligible to appear on Georgia's presidential ballot, although the final decision will be up to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.

The rulings by Michael Malihi, an administrative law judge, would block the qualifications of independents Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Cornel West, as well as the Green Party's Jill Stein and the Party for Socialism and Liberation's Claudia De la Cruz.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

So the provincional judge linked to a currently ruling party blocks all candidates in an election to a federal office, except the one from their party and the one they supposedly hate with every fiber of their body?

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

And the one from the Libertarian Party, because they think that will take votes from the Republicans. (Although the Libertarians are always on the ballot in Georgia, so maybe they're strong enough to withstand these kinds of challenges.)

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

I see they are striving to reach the heights of democracy

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago

The Democratic party is a bunch of cowardly fascists. They deserve everything coming to them.

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

What's the justification of the judge OOC?

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 43 points 2 weeks ago

They disrespected the Electoral College

In the Kennedy, West and De la Cruz cases, Malihi agreed with arguments made by the state Democratic Party that petitions for independent candidates must be filed in the name of the 16 presidential electors, and not the candidates themselves, citing a change made to Georgia law in 2017.

“In Georgia, independent candidates do not themselves qualify for the office of president and vice president of the United States of America for the ballot,” Malihi wrote. “Rather, individuals seeking the office of presidential elector qualify for the ballot to have their candidate for president or vice president placed on the ballot.”

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

arguments made by the state Democratic Party

Of fucking course lol. And they still can't figure out why they will be lined up alongside fascists after the revolution.

[-] naom3@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

The fuck. So because they’re a third party they can’t run for president and instead have to run for presidential elector on behalf of their presidential candidate so people can vote for not the electors but rather the actual candidate who gets put on the ballot, which will then get counted in favour of the electors running. This is different to how things are done with democrats/republicans apparently, who run for president and then presumably nominate electors, so people can vote for that candidate which then gets counted in favour of the electors. Just like with a third party. what-the-hell

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

Funny that liberals suddenly understand how voting suppression and using laws in frivolous ways works. But when it's a republican?

"We need a strong GOP because we have to compromise with the parliamentarian committee of the July Freedom caucus so that's why we can't have healthcare or housing."

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago

Just vote harder bro i-voted

[-] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

democracy :)

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago
[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I thought pumpkin slice (edit: spice) latte at first and was very confused and wondered how it would play out. Unfortunately it's something serious and I feel dumb about it.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Why the fuck does a Georgia state judge even have any power to disqualify candidates for a federal election in the first place?

Like this isn’t just your standard corruption, this is a fundamental failure of federalism lmao

[-] SSJMarx@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

The paradigm in America has always been that states control the voting process, it's one of the things that comes with having a disastrously out of date constitution.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s really not a good idea. Like, not even in a “I care about US democracy” way, I mean this in a very abstract “This is a bad way to run a federalized government” way.

[-] RaisedFistJoker@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

how much money does it cost to run in the us elections?

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
107 points (97.3% liked)

politics

22186 readers
312 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS