382
submitted 2 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

Shkreli claimed on a 2024 podcast that he had "burned the album and sent it to like, 50 different chicks"—and that this had been extremely good for his sex life.

I find that statement suspect.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 138 points 2 months ago

Imagine needing to give women someone else's mix tape to get them to have sex with you.

Tragic and sad.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 38 points 2 months ago

You just roasted like half the music industry

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Haha, amazing burn! Second hand street cred.

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 12 points 2 months ago

With all the money he has too ridiculous

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I handed girls my mix tapes in the 80s and they were all someone else's work. Get on my level!

[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 78 points 2 months ago

The fact that Wu Tang made this thing is gross. Fuck that art collector bullshit.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 2 months ago

Article said that they made it as a statement about the value drop in art because of digital markets. I hadn't known that, so I kinda respected it more than before I knew that.

[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 53 points 2 months ago

Seems like motivated reasoning to me. Making a statement while leaving most of the people who made you, poor folk who like your music, without the music but you with millions of Pharma Bro Dollars.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago

From wikipedia

“It's an uncomfortable subject to most of the guys, so we don't really discuss it too much. The process of the thing being made was never told to us. We were never told what it was. It was never supposed to be a Wu-Tang album. We were recording and being paid to do a certain amount of records by a guy whose name I don't want to mention. He took all these verses—some of them were old verses—and put them altogether into a compilation of Wu-Tang songs and marketed it as a Wu-Tang album, and a single copy of a Wu-Tang album. We all had a problem with it because that's not how it was described to us.”

—Method Man in 2024 on recording Once Upon a Time in Shaolin.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago

I think it was RZA and some dude named Silvaringz or some shit that made the decision without the rest of wu-tang approving. And they were not happy.

It was a money grab with an album that they all admit is shit. I can't really be mad at them for openly grifting a piece of trash like Shkreli.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

The statement would be to make the album and then not sell it to the next rich cunt.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

This just in, shocking news folks, piece of shit Pharma bro is still a piece of shit...

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

It's kind of funny though. This guy was shitty but like... A 2/10 compared to Elon. Some of the shit he did was funny in an obnoxious trollish way. Fuck me but I wish he was the worst we had to deal with currently.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

He's a POS for sure, but this whole case seems like they're trying to blame him for them not doing their DD. He a) owned a 50% stake in the copyright, and a judge found that gave him permission to make and distribute copies as he sees fit, b) He said quite publicly that distributing it was his intent, c) He didn't try to hide the fact that he distributed it, and d) all that happened before his conviction. It should have been plainly obvious that there were physical and digital copies made and distributed before the auction took place.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

God be has an incredibly punchable face

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's what I'm screaming. If "50 chicks" have a copy, where's the leakage? Mean to tell me none of them gave up the MP3s, not even for cold cash? None of them bragged and got made an offer?!

And here we see the obvious issues with conspiracies...

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

All I've found so far is 1 seedless torrent and a couple clips of it playing on his stream :/

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, given that they were probably high dollar prostitutes. The first thing they'd do is call TMZ...

[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

They'd prefer sex worker, prozzi has a real negative connotation

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

They'll prefer what the customer wants them to prefer

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago
[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

So in a bunch of e-waste graveyards

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Pretend to be a girl well enough and he'll send it to you.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

THAT Veronica Vaughn is one hot piece of ayyyce. I know from experience.

[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 months ago
[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

All ace's are hot. The fun part is we don't want to have sex with NOT_RICK because we're ace. That's the part of their post to disagree with, they don't know from experience.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I find that statement suspect

He gave them digital and copiable files that would still be worth a shit ton of money each time they copied it...

Like, the same circle of people that would know he had it and gives it out. Would know who else would pay for it

I'm honestly surprised they don't change the valuation of it to zero and hit him for the amount he used it to take off what he owes.

He's potentially made any copies worthless.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I think the guy that owns it is an nft shill so I hope it’s worthless, and I say that loving Wu Tang

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 7 points 2 months ago

Gotta be real, why would you as a fan want anything other than that album to be freely available for everyone to listen to?

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don’t think I do want it to be unavailable, I guess I am just uncomfortable with anything Wu tang put out to be considered worthless. I suppose they already got their bag for it though

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 10 points 2 months ago

Just because something is free of charge doesn't mean it isn't worth anything.

I'd consider the air I breathe to be pretty valuable.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Back in my Reddit days, as soon as it was posted that he bought this thing, about 1000000000000000 comments on every post of this news article postulated that he would do exactly this.

Like, duh

[-] gencha@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

Sounds a lot more expensive than regular prostitutes

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I find that statement suspect.

Why? Dude is definitely laying pipe simply because he is wealthy. Remember that reporter who covered the trial and interviewed him in prison, she started a relationship with him and immediately divorced her husband. Then Skreli dumped her the moment he got out. That broad definitely only gave him head to get ahead in life.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Can you imagine being married to someone, having a family with them, they get a really cool project at work that exposes them to some billionaire. Then they realise that a short relationship with a billionaire will get them further ahead in life than a lifetime of being with you and they drop your whole family just like that. There is nothing you can do because it's true, you'll never be able to offer them anything close to what they have access to. Convincing them into staying with you means fundamentally holding them back, forcing them into a life of regrets and what ifs.

Fucking brutal.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Shkreli claimed on a 2024 podcast that he had “burned the album and sent it to like, 50 different chicks”—and that this had been extremely good for his sex life.

I find that statement suspect.

One of the recipients responded positively, which increased his lifetime sexual encounters by ∞%

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

The value of that album is measurable until he copied it. Once a copy is out then it’s worth significantly less.

[-] Bangs42@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I mean, everyone has a type. Even Manson had a fanclub.

Still, 🤮.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, I don't think I'm getting a fanclub any time soon lol

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

God what a twatwaffle.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

No fucking shit

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
382 points (96.1% liked)

News

23287 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS