this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
794 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59190 readers
2399 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

slaps the hood of my 03 Acura shitbox type S

Yep, she's a keeper.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I plan to drive my Corolla shitbox into the ground. The only problem with my plan is that the earth will only be around for a few hundred million years. Maybe a few billion? And (as long as you do the maintenance on time) Corollas will last until the heat death of the universe.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Its sad. I LOVE the concept of smart devices, the fact that you can do things so much more conveniently with little interaction. They can absolutely be done without being privacy nightmares, but apparently companies are not interested in that.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And apparently neither are consumers

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't care about my data. I have nothing to hide. Haha they can have my data if they want.

Literally everyone i know

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're missing the larger point. You dont have to have anything to hide for it to be an issue. They can now blackmail you for things they know about you, track you, use targeted advertising, listen in on your conversations. Hell, if there was a need to make you look guilty of a crime, with all the data on you, it wouldn't be that difficult to do.

Doesn't even get into the issues of fighting back against oppressive government, which isnmuch more difficult to do if they're constantly spying on you.

But, you're right, nothing to hide, so it's not a big deal I guess.

[–] teruma@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the post you replied to was sarcasm.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

In the case of cars there isn't really an alternative. The study the article cites looked at a bunch of different manufacturers and found the all sucked for privacy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. I've been slowly adding more and more smart devices to my Home Assistant instance and seeing it all interact is super neat. That said, the search for products that work 100% local and don't depend on the cloud is a total pain, outside of some products using the Zigbee standard and such.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Zigbee and z-wave is the way to go, yeah. They work completely local and disconnected from the internet (in fact, they cannot directly connect to the internet).

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I post this a second time because this post is more active. What can we do to stop the transfer of data? Can we disconnect the antenna/modem that connects the cars to the Internet?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

I know my vehicle has a fuse to pull to disconnect the modem.

[–] lilShalom@lemmy.basedcount.com 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 43 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Thanks for the advice, I'll just walk 26 miles to work each day I guess...

[–] lilShalom@lemmy.basedcount.com 12 points 1 year ago

Get something made before 2017.

[–] Wookie@artemis.camp 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They sell other cars you know?

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Great.

Which ones will not spy on me?

[–] deus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cars made in the 20th century are probably safe.

[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Safe from a privacy perspective. Otherwise they're very unsafe by modern standards. Minimal airbags. Often no ABS. What ABS that is there is less sophisticated than modern systems. Worse structures for crash protection. No stability control. No traction control.

Plus they're just old. Last year, I spent more on my 20 year old car than I did on my 2 year old car, that includes loan payments on the new car, fuel, tires, insurance, and maintenance.

Get something from this century at least.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Go for a car from the 19th century just to be sure. They might miss a few features, such as differential, but if you're worried about your privacy it'll be worth it!

/j obviously.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This has been one of the major reasons I have no desire to buy a new car. I do not want a $30k IoT device that spies on me. Unfortunately, that is pretty much the norm now.

If/when I am forced to buy another, I’ll be looking hard into which ones are the easiest to rip the modem out of. Can’t be an IoT spying device without the internet.

[–] Logh@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I’m looking into restomods myself. No need to buy a new car and rip it up.

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder what your insurance company would say about that.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People modify their cars all the time and my insurance company has no business tracking everything I do either.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Fuck that insurance company. When mine shipped a couple of OBD-II connection boxes for us to install for our auto insurance, I sent them back. They told me I wouldn't get their special discount if I didn't install the trackers in our 2 vehicles. I said I'm not installing your tracker boxes regardless. I continue to have car insurance, and those alleged discounts didn't really amount to much.

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm reposting this in every thread so anyone can see:

https://www.nissanusa.com/privacy.html

Sensitive personal information, including driver’s license number, national or state identification number, citizenship status, immigration status, race, national origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, sexual orientation, sexual activity, precise geolocation, health diagnosis data, and genetic information.

[–] YourBrainOnScience@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure why Nissan needs my sexual activity data but I can maliciously comply and make them regret asking for it.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Keep sending images of goatse. But seriously speaking, it's probably not humans that are collating and sifting the data. It's all being fed to an algorithm.

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Humans have access to the databases. Now another human can go to the nissan'sheadquarters of their countries, and request by the law of this country, that nissan provides the name of every people who had gay sex in their nissans.

Then they can arrest them and execute them.

That's the issue with collected datas. You ignore when some totilarist government will access those.

[–] Nightwind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wtf. Genetic information. So they can take your DNA after bringing your car in for service and sell it?

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You joke, but I could see some bean counting fuck being all over that business idea

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PoorlyWrittenPapyrus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

sexual activity

What the fuck?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is why GM is looking to remove android auto and Apple CarPlay. No mediator between them and your data

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't really go into depth, but I worked for a major automaker, privacy is a joke for newer cars even if you don't pay for the Internet plans.

[–] pyr0ball@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is there anything a mildly competent electronics enthusiast could do to disable any outbound data?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Are dumb cars still manufactured? I don't drive so I have no clue what the market's like.

[–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Holy god. I'm not letting go of my '09 carolla and ebike. What the fuck.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But drivers are given little or no control over the personal data their vehicles collect, researchers for the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation said Wednesday in their latest "Privacy Not Included" survey Security standards are also vague, a big concern given automakers' track record of susceptibility to hacking.

Cars scored worst for privacy among more than a dozen product categories -- including fitness trackers, reproductive-health apps, smart speakers and other connected home appliances -- that Mozilla has studied since 2017.

The absence of such a law lets connected devices and smartphones amass data for tailored ad targeting and other marketing -- while also raising the odds of massive information theft through cybersecurity breaches.

Japan-based Nissan astounded researchers with the level of honesty and detailed breakdowns of data collection its privacy notice provides, a stark contrast with Big Tech companies such as Facebook or Google.

Further, Nissan says it can share "inferences" drawn from the data to create profiles "reflecting the consumer's preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behaviour, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes."

If an owner opts out of data collection, Tesla's privacy notice says the company may not be able to notify drivers "in real time" of issues that could result in "reduced functionality, serious damage, or inoperability."


The original article contains 874 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of the reasons I got a motorcycle instead.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

When Tesla came about ,I said privacy in cars is going to be a problem in the the future if people keep buying them and nobody protests. Well, we are now in that future. Crotch rockets may be our salvation.

load more comments
view more: next ›