this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
491 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39332 readers
3421 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In short:

Facebook is scraping the public data of all Australian adults on the platform, it has acknowledged in an inquiry.

The company does not offer Australians an opt out option like it does in the EU, because it has not been required to do so under privacy law.

What's next?

Facebook representatives could not say whether an opt-out option would be offered to Australians in the future.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 74 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Say it with me now:

Everything you submit to a platform becomes property of that platform.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And your family posted, and your friends posted.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a key factor. It's not possible to avoid being in their system at this point unless you live under a rock.

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was having this discussion with a coworker after Apple's event where they talked about their image scanning AI. Like, if someone takes a picture of me, and sends it to the AI's servers, they'll use it as training data, but I haven't consented to it. So how does taking it down work?

It's obviously a rhetorical question. They obviously won't, and they'll tell me to pound sand.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

I think it's a really important question though, and one that bears repeating again and again. AI was built on a complete disregard for consent, and that continued disregard makes it all very unconscionable.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I had a person that hated me in high school and put up a fake profile with a picture taken of me at school. So don't forget enemies posted!

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But... I posted that copy pasta on my feed about how I didn't give Facebook permission to scrape my data. Are you telling me that wasn't legally binding?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

"couldn't hurt!"

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

This is what happens when you have a government with lack luster privacy laws.

EU citizens have less to worry over this.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s probably not just adults

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ms Claybaugh added that accounts of people under 18 were not scraped, but when asked by Senator Sheldon whether public photos of his own children on his account would be scraped, Ms Claybaugh acknowledged they would.

The Facebook representative could not answer whether the company scraped data from previous years of users who were now adults, but were under 18 when they created their accounts.

Welp

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Facebook representative could not answer whether...

This guy's terrible at his job. Even I can answer that one.

Abso-fucking-lutely yes.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

the job doesn't involve telling the truth

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My opinion is that if your data or work is within an AI training set you should be given free access to any tools using that data. That's only fair considering these companies also think everything should be free for them to take.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think you should be able to get all of your data in any dataset or tool deleted whenever you ask them to. Not possible? That's their problem not yours, should've thought of that before collecting all information known to man

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago

I definitely agree with this too

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it already exists in the EU

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

Well yeah, but I still can't delete my data from ai models

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago

Well that's fun

I'm not Australian, and I don't post on Facebook.

But my family posts on Facebook, including pictures of me. I hate that I didn't consent to any of this, yet they've fed my face into their AI tools.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the data was public. Literally anyone could scrape it

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I read this in Trump’s debate voice.

[–] obbeel 4 points 3 months ago

I appreciate the honesty.

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but they are all up-side down.

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

That's ok, so is the population distribution.

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Jokes on them. Facebook in Australia is an absolute cesspool.

And nobody from Facebook is doing anything with the reports

So, the only application for this data is to build a bot which acts like an asshole and make photos of cars which assholes own.

[–] texasspacejoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

How much you wanna bet the didn't just stop at the adult accounts

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So stuff people post publicly should be private?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I post a picture on my private profile that only my friends can see, yes, that should be private.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but what if you post public stuff for the public to see? That’s what’s in question here I believe

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The post says everything, which would include the private.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Facebook admits to scraping every Australian adult user's public photos and posts

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You're right. I misremembered.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It does say public, but I guess it's a confusing article. In any case, I'm all for privacy and not defending social media at all, just that if someone else chooses to not be private then they shouldn't be unhappy if it's actually not private is what I meant.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You're right, I had misremembered the phrasing. I just hate that the current state of affairs is everything you put online is going into model training. I feel everything should be opt in. If a company wants to profit off of my stuff, they should have to ask, even if it's hosted there, especially since when these social media sites first came about, the idea of training data models with user information wasn't a thing.

I'd begrudgingly accept a cutoff where anything prior to a date where terms were explicitly set to include language for data modeling was excluded. It's really dumb that the advent of new technologies just allows companies to profit of anyone's creations with permission.