157

US big mad

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 112 points 1 year ago

But he said the launch also raises questions around how Huawei managed to launch the phone when it has spent the past four years under US restrictions banning access to 5G technology. “While access to 5G for the chipset is one thing, I’m not sure how the company managed to source all the other components that need to go into a 5G smartphone, such as power amps, switches and filters,” he said.

Love that America's 21st century cold war is fully predicated on the assumption that China does not have the ability to develop its own productive capacity.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 82 points 1 year ago

Huawei is literally one of the cocreators of 5G

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago

yeah, don't really understand the shock here

the whole policy really seems... stupid. Like, we've kinda hit a plateau with microchips and CPUs. Any smaller and you start getting quantum interference and the board becomes useless. So why is the stated strategy to prevent innovation on this front? What difference does it make? Either US leaders are fighting last century's battle and assuming this is perfectly analogous to the Soviet computer industry, or it's a distraction for something more covert.

But... I don't really know what the latter could be. I'm half convinced we're just not capable of that kind of thing anymore, that all the old heads have retired and all our clandestine institutions are staffed by their starry-eyed children. People with the right connections and none of the skills.

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

Probably a lot of racism that the inferior Chinese couldn't possibly create quality tech without stealing it

[-] ChapoKrautHaus@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

So why is the stated strategy to prevent innovation on this front? What difference does it make?

White people get to stay on top of the food chain for like two extra months. That's enough for these guys to justify it.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

I think it's mostly a version of the former. The US has a hammer (sanctions to restrict tech and capital intensive development) and they only know how to wing it at nails. The failure of US sanctions to truly hurt Russia is an example of this - it really does seem like they thought they'd do more, even though the "bring EU closer to the US" strat worked for now.

I'm sure there are wonks that have thought of contingencies around this anti-China strategy so that there are multiple ways to "win", but I think the core of it is to try to slow down China's growth and domination of tech, as the US (and EU vassals) rely heavily on their (self-) advantaged position in tech monopolies. The US and EU absolutely cannot compete so the US is trying to delay and to carve out more spaces to neocolonize (EU better be ready for that lol). EU countries are playing with the idea of being less vassalized but so far haven't done anything concrete.

One "win" will probably be that this slots into a general new cold war anti-China narrative. They're always slapping that "China bad" button so that the US populace will be amenable to having their consent manufactured for more. Notice that the US media narratives are, "I guess the sanctions didn't work against those threatening sneaky [slur]s, so how do we escalate even more?" and not, "why are there even sanctions and who wants them?" Getting ready to escalate and escalate, hoping that China will eventually react so strongly that there will be a watershdd moment.

The Amerikkkan political class only knows how to ramp up tensions until they have the excuses they need to do mass murder for profit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KarlBarqs@hexbear.net 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

outsource the construction of absolutely everything to China

confused as to how China makes Things

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CW: Racism"The ~~Russians~~ Chinese never invent anything. All they have, they’ve got from others. Everything comes to them from abroad—the engineers, the machine-tools. Give them the most highly perfected ~~bombing-sights~~ smartphones. They’re capable of copying them, but not of inventing them." - ~~Adolf Hitler~~ US liberals

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

reddit-logo and liberals et al continuing to carry on a proud legacy of white supremacy by insisting that countries predominantly populated by non-white peoples are too fucking stupid to do anything for themselves without outside help

[-] Melonius@hexbear.net 56 points 1 year ago

I can't tell if this is the usual coordinated anti-China prop or a big ad buy from Huawei, because the net effect is I really want a Huawei phone now sicko-wistful

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's sort of the floor for flagship phones. That's why I'm ten generations behind 😎

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

I don't get paying more than $150 for a phone. I just need to check emails, read hexbear, and listen to podcasts. Am I the only one terrified about having this fragile and very stealable $2000 thing in my pocket???

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] HodgePodge@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

still cheaper than the top tier iphone & samsung phones lol

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that the US government must be freaking out right now because I suspect they had a strategy to hamper the Chinese military tech development by cutting off their supply of cutting-edge semiconductors, and it looks like their plan may be starting to fall apart.

I'm trying to figure out whether this is a good thing because it will provide China with more deterrence, should it be a mass produced domestic semiconductor which is catching up on the best semiconductors that Taiwan and the west can produce, or if it's bad news because it will encourage the US to accelerate their plans for war with China.

I guess I just hope that China can break ahead and reach escape velocity before the US can advance to the point where it feels ready to execute its plans for war.

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

US is already unable to defeat China in a war. hypersonic missiles are one thing, but China has several other advantages. the PLA Navy has more ships than the US Navy (they are smaller ships, which could be an advantage in modern peer war— smaller target, harder to detect, better maneuverability). manufacturing is a huge advantage China has— even in domestic arms manufacturing, which the US didn’t deindustrialize as drastically as other industries, the US is severely lacking and is dwarfed even by Russia’s production. US is just not ready for a peer war. you could argue that China’s soldiers are untested in battle, and you would be correct, but US tactics and operations are well known and are being studied by PLA personnel. the US strategy doesnt even work well, as evidenced by the horrible performance against countries 10% of their size.

nuclear war is a very real fear, but that would mean mutual destruction or complete destruction of the US with heavy but sustainable damage to China. China has enough of a nuclear arsenal to perform second-strike and even third-strike nuclear attacks. we are also unaware of the efficacy of China’s missile defense systems (they may not be able to defend against nuclear warheads, but i wouldn’t put it past them). also the US nuclear arsenal is old and could have problems that prevent launch

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

The last thing even vaguely resembling a battle the us miliary was involved in was Fallujah in 2004, 20 years ago, and that was mostly the us encircling the city with heavy weapons then flattening it, not any kind of fight.

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

my point exactly, they only engage in fighting where they vastly outnumber the enemy. this was even true in the european front of WW2

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

US is just not ready for a peer war. you could argue that China’s soldiers are untested in battle, and you would be correct

uhhhh the US's soldiers are also untested in battle. None of the soldiers on the fighting lines will have ever been in a war before, all the Iraq war vets are like 40 years old.

and all their generals are untested in battle excepting against goat herders in a flat floodplain desert river valley

this is a moot point and a cope that proamericans fall on, it literally isn't even true.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] grazing7264@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kirin 9000S is equivalent to the Snapdragon 865, GPU is equivalent to 888. Only mobile chip to support multi-threading, probably because it's a modified server chip.

Really impressive. It's faster than the Google Tensor G2 when power consumption is equalized. Tensor sucks but still the best that Google has to offer despite having no sanctions to deal with.

This is way better than the earlier domestic produced Chinese silicon I've seen (full sized desktop GPUs). The domestic GPUs seemed really bad so this a huge leap in the last 6 months. The GPU in this phone is probably better than the full size GPU I saw lol.

On a side note I want to know how well China's AI chips are doing. Nvidia seems to have an impossible lead right now over AMD, AI model training seems like a huge priority for national security and tech so it would be very interesting to see how they're doing compared to consumer chips.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Lmao it's cool af they put a server CPU into a phone

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Modern ARM processors are nuts. My three year old phone has a GPU, in raw tflop numbers at least (I know) more powerful than an Xbox One. 1.4 tflops

The overclocked Adreno 740 in the Samsung Galaxy S23 has the equivalent tflops to an Xbox Series S(3.8 I think).

This isn't even mentioning Apple's ARM laptop chips. M1 macs and that.

And I haven't even mentioned CPUs.

Obviously comparing tflops across different architectures is more of a fun exercise than a meaningful comparison, but it's still very interesting to see.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Owl@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

I didn't realize that the chip embargo was just targeting 5G. What an absurd move. It's a completely unimportant technology, why is that where you draw the line in the sand? And it's not some incredibly advanced thing that's hard to replicate, it's just a communications standard embedded on a chip. The only thing this embargo does is force China to arbitrarily build this specific supply chain entirely in their own country. Which China's rivals shouldn't even want! Having supply chains spread across dozens of countries makes it harder for all of those countries to go to war

[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

5G is a hugely important technology. It's not just rinky dink cell phones streaming cat videos, it has massive implications for automation, like this mostly-automated port in China that uses it.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

The only thing this embargo does is force China to arbitrarily build this specific supply chain entirely in their own country.

deng-drip development of productive forces go brrr

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

It's not just about 5g. Huawei Kirin chips used to be manufactured at TSMC on their process (which is the best in the world for ARM chips), that is not allowed to happen anymore. So Huawei had to engineer their own process for making the chips, and the fact that they're only two or three years behind TSMC now, despite all the sanctions, is incredible. They're even ahead of Google's own ARM tensor chips (which are just rebadged old Samsung designs).

[-] raven@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm so sick of hearing about 5G my god why is it in everyone's mind so much? I've been able to stream a youtube video at 720 over 4g for a while now what do you need to do faster than that on a phone?? I'm a big tech nerd but this literally doesn't affect me.

[-] rosurgeos@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It may not affect you, but it does affect me. 5G helps greatly with congestion. We have a holiday home in a skiing resort in Switzerland and during peak season, 4G is practically unusable, even 720p cat videos barely load. Last year several 5G antennas were installed around the village and I now get speeds >300Mbit, allowing me to even comfortably work remotely from there. 5G has had a very positive impact on my life.

[-] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

We have a holiday home in a skiing resort in Switzerland

mao-shining

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Y’all mfs are dunking on this fool but the problem and solution they’re describing is real.

Congestion reduces the bandwidth available to devices and their latency as the infrastructure shuffles packets to try and make everyone happy.

Now we might say “good, fuck em!” When those devices are tied to a ski resort for the wealthy but that same problem rears its head in dense urban environments.

Using 5g to get better volume of data in cities neatly sidesteps one of its major flaws: it can’t penetrate anything. No need to stick to bands that aren’t readily absorbed or reflected if you can just put up another radio and rely on the multi ghz handsets to filter the noise.

The whole point of America trying to limit 5g radio chips from China is to prevent the wireless enabling high density development technology from reaching the global rival that’s doing high density development.

The reason it’s radio chipsets and not processors (what the 9000 is) is that you need a fast radio ic to handle all the weird fucked up noise on the 5g band both because it’s used for everything, not just cell phones, and because the use case of a handset is gonna have massive noise anyway due to the reflectivity and absorbtion in the target band.

If you wanted to prevent a country from making effective use of wireless handsets you wouldn’t keep them from using badass arm flagship chips, you’d keep joes good radio chip out of their hands because without that their cpu is just gonna be burning cores to figure out what the hell is coming in off the antenna.

E: also, turn off 5g. All that shit about absorbtion doesn’t just apply to buildings. There’s a reason why all the military radio operators working next to huge transmitters heard voices and have a specific smattering of disorders.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

It's really useful for machines that communicate with each other

Really important in the industrial and manufacturing industry

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cunigulus@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

If it's true that they're still a bit behind the cutting edge in lithography technology, then China is going to blow past the rest of the world in advanced semiconductors in the next 2-3 years. Wringing that kind of performance out of less precise lithography techniques means their chips will be better than western chips once they achieve parity in lithography technology, which will probably happen in the next 2-3 years. Before the end of the decade China is going to be decisively more technologically advanced than the US. It's fucking over.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PZK@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said during a White House press briefing Tuesday that the US needs “more information about precisely its character and composition” to determine if parties bypassed American restrictions on semiconductor exports to create the new chip.

"They couldn't have possibly made this, they had to have stolen it from us somehow."

I wonder how long before they do the classic thing of saying 👽s made it for them. Just like how there was no way the ancient Egyptians built the pyramids on their own so it had to be posad.

[-] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

white people never invented anything and Tesla was an alien. You heard it here first but more and more people will be saying this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Communism is when iphone and now the CIA is losing their shit

[-] Grimble@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Hater behavior

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Also, even if the use did have concrete advantages, the us has chased so many chinese scientists and engineers out of the us. Those people still exist.

[-] HodgePodge@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago
[-] moujikman@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

"China" didn't create the smartphone, a Chinese company did. And we won't be able to buy it or use it.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
157 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23275 readers
41 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS