@yogthos With Apple you'll probably have to buy a whole new computer from them
Windows does this too where they just stop supporting older hardware. I find the worst part is that new versions of Windows/MacOS are largely just random bloat that nobody asked for.
That's correct. Apple has near the same setting but it doesn't belong into this meme, which is more like m$ vs. Linux
Apple is actually pretty nice with how MacOS gets installed. Macs themselves have a recovery thing if you want to reinstall. If I remember correctly it is hardcoded with a version that came out before the device was released, but can automatically detect and verify a newer installed version.
They get ya by tracking every last program you open, being hostile towards user choice, and charging you hundreds of dollars for $50 of storage.
Pop os implement rexocery partition too which u can use to reinstall all os
This is slightly different but that's only because Apple has the monopolistic advantage of they made the device.
Can’t actually buy MacOS, you have to buy their hardware. For the time being connecting with an Apple Account is still fully optional.
I got macOS running in a VM on my Linux desktop. But then I didn’t want to connect my main iCloud account because I have heard they may ban you if you they detect you are doing stuff like this.
Without an iCloud account I can’t really do the stuff I actually would want to use macOS for, like using Apple’s movie editing software, or making iPhone apps with XCode. The default mail app is nicer than any alternative for Linux I’m aware of, at least.
I never heard of anybody having their iCloud account blocked after using hackintosh and I have qhuite a few friends using it. I think as long as you have actual apple products connected to that account, they won’t block it as to not deter their customers.
The only case I read was on reddit, but they created a new account from scratch and the ban might not even have been related to the hackintosh but just because it was deemed suspicious.
You sound like the kinda person who mixes coca cola and fanta together
That would be a very spezial drink
Hmm maybe I’ll look into it again. The concern had something to do with having to spoof a serial number. I own Final Cut and would love to have the beefy GPU and CPU in my desktop accelerate it, but also am very afraid of losing my main account with that and a lot more. Already my current workflow is to render on my old MacBook as uncompressed, then transfer it to my desktop and use FFMPEG to compress. Better results and much faster than trying to have my MacBook do any sort of video compression.
I ran a hackintosh for about 7 years and they didn't care, I used an Apple account. Don't think I had an iCloud though, maybe it makes a difference that I set up that account originally some years prior to building the hackintosh on a real mac.
i dont think apple forces a account on you like microsoft does and they say they are "piracy respecting" like if you only want a editing machine then you dont need a apple account
Edit: Tbh the tracking pixels concern me but your personal data is not sold which is good and i remember in ios telemetry was opt out
Linux installs have gotten so quick and painless over the past decade or so. Usually just following a GUI, waiting like 5 minutes for the install, and suddenly you’re booted into a fresh desktop.
On LTT there was a race and the person who chose to install Linux had a huge head start as the install only took a few minutes. While Linus took forever to install windows.
I forget the outcome of the video, but I wish he would show more support for Linux on his channel.
I love Arch, but it's disingenuous to say that the install process is as easy as Install? Done.
I think that would be a fair argument if the meme was claiming it was low/zero effort, but it's just about freedom so it flies
Idk archinstall is pretty straightforward if you choose a DE. No harder than installing windows if you haven't done either before.
Help documentation and available of "support" (friendly nerds) to chat to is better than windows too.
I betcha a Feddit silver that If I ran through archinstall I’d run into some zany error not covered in the documentation
Yes installing Arch is as easy as counting to 10
After you get decently experienced with Linux, you're tempted to move to a "difficult-to-setup" distro for fun and more flexibility. Nothing wrong with normie distros, but these advanced distros are really good - you can strip down "bloat", pick your own init system, your own login daemon as well as your own job scheduler.
I see four Linux logos and one of them looks suspiciously out of place
Yeah, Arch isn't exactly an easy install for beginners.
I was thinking about Ubuntu pushing for snaps, but you're probably right
Is it really this easy? I want to side load linux onto my desktop so i can start transitioning over (especially because i have an ancient laser printer with linux drivers in the box, that windows 10 wont support!)
I basically only use foobar, firefox, and gimp as it is
It depends on your technical knowledge and the distro you choose. But I would say it's that easy
yeah it's that easy, install Ubuntu, ignore anyone who says this is not good and you have to install something else, it's bad yes but it's bad in Linux standards still much better than windows
I had Mint up and running within an hour of deciding I was going to do so. Nvidia drivers gave me a bit of trouble but I had those solved in another hour. It really is that easy.
I don't know what's the easiest way to do it because my installations are all kind of custom, but I'd say make some free space (50 GB probably to start with) from within Windows and then tell the Linux installer to use the free space in the disk and that's basically it. If those are your programs you are ideal to be running Linux, though, you may want to try actual Linux music players.
the only issue with linux tbh is the lack of professional apps someone told me before that you have to use the open source alterntives but i have a affinity photo free trial for 6 months and i need either windows and mac to use it i can run it on linux by compiling a fork of wine that fixes it but time wasting
However anticheat games arent big of a deal anymore and i learned after switching to linux running anything in the windows kernel is very sketchy but i kinda want roblox but they well explained why they blocked linux tbh
i enjoy linux tho its very nice but i wish the app support is improved and ik this is a memes lemmy community
Use Sober for Roblox. It's closed source though but made by same dev of vinegar.
i kinda dont wanna use the android version of roblox to game but if its my only option then prob and thats why i still dualboot windows 10(downgraded from windows 11 bcs its soo slow and garbage even on my midrange gaming pc + i have heard about it before
No poblem. I only play Roblox to play my friend games. So, I didn't know about that.
The Roblox mobile build isn't really just mobile, and afaict has no issues that Windows Roblox doesn't have.
and also i kinda wanna use bloxstrap as well it has some qol features to roblox but i didnt say this cause it was not that important to say and also not a cons but sober is also waydroid with tweaks for roblox and stuff
Why?
this reason might sound weird but Mainly bcs some games think your playing on mobile i love how you can play pc only games and has good mouse and keyboard support tho
yeah i might have sounded akward
The prompts to upgrade Office 365 every time my gaming PC updates really hurts after using a Linux machine all day
Lol, $100 would be a deal now. It's $140-200 for Windows 11 depending on if you get Home or Pro.
I looked up how much it would cost to get a Windows Server license to run in a VM on my linux server, and that's a minimum of $500 (but possibly more depending on factors that are irrelevant as an individual). I decided I'd run unactivated Win10Home instead with some registry hacks to make things auto-start the way I want. If that stops working, I guess I'll just stop doing automated Windows CI.
I think with memes, there's something of an implicit promise of at least some degree of comedy. I get the sentiment here about proprietary vs open source operating systems but there doesn't really seem to be even an attempt at being funny besides maybe the way the characters are drawn which, given that as memes, they are recycled art used to establish the format, they don't really elicit much of a laugh because there's not even an expression of humour through the original artwork.
This isn't really a commentary or a parallel or satire on that distinction between open source and proprietary OS installation, it's more accurately describable as a complaint. Simply placing this complaint underneath the yes chad and crying wojak's doesn't really feel like a step up from a text post that says "I don't like Windows or Mac OS because you have to pay for them and they make you sign up for and agree to things". No one asked for my opinion I know, but I think this is a critique worth making: if you sum up your attempted meme in a bland, emotionally neutral sentence and then compare that bare sentence to its proposed meme counterpart and you can barely see the difference then maybe it's not a meme that has to exist. The format is flexible, but you can still use traditional written words to express complex thoughts, not everything has to be meme-ified and if it's not even funny when it is, why should it be?
Funny is subjective
