this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
239 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3038 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M600@lemmy.world 33 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

How is it not illegal for her to say these things? Like is that a threat against the United States?

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Depends.

Protected by the first amendment, one can legally advocate for the dissolution of the Union through bicameral ratification outlined constitutionally. To advocate for armed insurrection or violent overthrow of the federal government is sedition and considered quite illegal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, with what I'm genuinely concerned is going to happen, that would probably be preferable. Give everyone some notice, and we can escape the nutjobs by being homeless in California and New York instead of concentrated in camps in Florida and Georgia. I mean, it'll inevitably make the blue state nation more conservative as they blame southern refugees for all their problems, but it'd still be better more than likely

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 51 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Don't threaten me with a good time lady.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

So they know that Texas doesn't have a GDP high enough to even run all their red catastrophies, right? I'm kidding, I know they don't know. They probably also don't know that CA would be the third largest super power if they ever let us go. Which they won't. At all.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Californians are in an abusive relationship. Blamed for everything and not allowed to leave

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Just let us have our fires in peace damnit!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 133 points 18 hours ago (15 children)

.......yeah, ok. Sounds good.

moves to California

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 25 points 17 hours ago (8 children)

I’ve got “Hotel California” and “San Francisco” battling it out in my head now.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

California Girls. And I'm not specifying which one

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 66 points 17 hours ago

that's not… usually what you do win you win. so like… honestly… okay, kick me out, let me be governed by a saner government. also DC is between two blue state so good luck evacuating back to your conservative safe space, dumbass

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 43 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

I mean... as long as California takes Colorado and New Mexico with it, I see no real issues with that. We get the economy, the nature, and the nukes.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 15 hours ago (4 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We'll bring along Oregon and Washington, at least the west halves, and call the country the Collective of American States.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Lets go for the Fallout 2 version I want to annoy everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 61 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Predictable. The donvict-humpers supposedly "win", and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

I suspect it's because for this brief period of time, anyway, it's hard for them to avoid just how HATED they and their precious golden donvict truly are. They thought they'd "win" and all the normal Americans around them would just disappear. And yet, Karens like Green continue to get confronted by normal people.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 47 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The donvict-humpers supposedly “win”, and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

Because we've stolen their martyrdom from them by losing.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is outrageously anecdotal but the trumpers I know were all grins on the day after until they realized we weren’t gonna just get over this and they just labeled themselves. They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago

They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

Yeah, the Professional Left did an entire section about this and they mentioned the case where some husband is completely gobsmacked that his wife filed for divorce.

But yeah, I've seen the same thing and heard about it from others. Lots of quiet interactions about how so and so is a big proponent of donvict; don't invite him/her to {whatever social function}.

The refrain of "yeah, but let's just agree to disagree" - I can see why many people, especially those most at risk thanks to what they wan, are thinking: "YEAH, FUCK THAT. You just voted to harm me, and you want to act like it's just a disagreement?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aztechnology@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

California would do so much better on its own I feel like

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 37 points 16 hours ago

Blue states pay more in taxes than they receive, and vice versa with red states. We are literally funding them dragging us all backwards.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 43 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

5th largest economy on the planet by itself.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Russia has a smaller economy. Go ahead. Make it without us. Dumb fucks.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Can… can Washington come? The western half at least?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Washington and Oregon are basically Very Northern California.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 17 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The rest of the US doesn't deserve California's economy

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

I'm literally moving to a blue state. The one good idea she had I beat her to it. Peace idiots.

[–] Daze@sh.itjust.works 40 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

What's the split on ports in blue states vs red states?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Pretty much all in Blue states - the Red states have no pacific access and lode out on the eastern megacity.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (5 children)

Canada has given the world some of the worst extremists, racists, etc. (Proud Boys being one of the more recent horrible things we've exported)

There's a group that popped up during the convoy called diagolon. They posted this way back which seems like how things would work (a path from Russia to Florida)

They claim it's a joke, but isn't it always just a joke.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Pretty sure BC, VA, and CO are not going along with that.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago

I think it still works if you swap Alberta for BC and exclude VA and CO

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 25 points 17 hours ago

[Wearing the US flag as a t-shirt and a pair of pajamas]: "I believe in the UNITED States of America!!!! ..... but I want a divorce"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›