this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
1465 points (99.5% liked)

Memes

8267 readers
347 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] H2207@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Why do I feel like I'm the only person who uses the Element Zapper tool in uBlock Origin. Just choose the tool and one-click delete any elements you want.

Most of the time the "Adblocker Detected" prompt is an overlay on top of the website, so just zap that out of existence.

In my experience this doesn't work most of the time. It will remove the pop-up but the page won't function. I realise it sometimes has an overlay under the pop-up but upon removing that it removes the content I'm trying to view. Not saying it doesn't work sometimes but it rarely does for me.

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] H2207@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No problem :)

[–] johnsaballer@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also if you use tampermonkey or greasemonkey use Anti-AdBlock Killer by Reek

https://reek.github.io/anti-adblock-killer/

[–] dorumon@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should be using assassinate-ad-block-blockers instead because anti-adblock-killer is old and ancient and outdated and also broken alongside not getting active support anymore.

https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/382482-assassinate-ad-block-blockers/code

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Am I just fucked on mobile?

[–] argentcorvid@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

ff mobile has ublock origin

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Use Firefox. Add-ons that work for desktop on Firefox also work on mobile.

[–] feecoomeeq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Firefox with uBlock - "daily driver" Firefox Focus - just to quick open a link and forget about it not having to close the tab KiwiBrowser - kind of power user browser with all Chrome add-ons available to install, so uBlock and ViolentMonkey work fine.

load more comments (1 replies)

I just have a adblock block blocker.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

That tool is so good lmao, also if you're quick you can refresh websites + do a screenshot to get the text before it's blocked out. Ctrl + P works on some sites too if you're quick

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know what the last straw for me was? A few years ago, when people got infected with malware from ads including ads that ran on a Forbes article about malware in ads that you had to disable your adblocker to read.

[–] MisterChief@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does an ad give you malware?

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either by linking to malware so you get infected if you click the ad, or by containing malware directly. Ads can contain code, making them almost like small applications that run when loaded.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ads can contain code, making them almost like small applications that run when loaded.

Which browser in 2023 would dare allow that to run?

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The code is JavaScript--an integral part of displaying modern websites. Not since the days before 2001 and very simple browsers like Netscape Navigator 3 and Internet Explorer 3 that didn't yet have javascript. Today that is what adblock is doing - it stops loading untrustworthy or unwanted bits and pieces of code while still giving the end-user (most of) the javascripts they need. Instead of the default action, "ok, gimme the whole webpage code, as-is". That last sentence, that's Chrome. I can explain it some more further. But that's the jist of it.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About a year or two ago I'd open up an article blocked by ad blocker and I'd try tweaking my settings a little, thinking if it were easy, I'd use a bit of effort to get to the writing I wanted to read.

I did that for a while with about a 50/50 chance that one setting or just clicking a few things and I could get to the copy.

Now I don't really care ..... there's a million things to read on the internet ... if I see a site and it even throws up a challenge, an extra click or ad blocker has affected it ... I don't even bother, just close it, forget it and move on.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or if you don't have an ad blocker running and the site expects you to try to read through a little 1 inch peephole in between the ads. I just write the site off entirely.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also makes you wonder .... what monster thought that was a good design.

Also equally disturbing is ... that there are actual people out there who put up with all this and read the content through that little peep hole. I know several of my older less tech savvy friends who put up with all that. I also know a few younger tech ignorant friends who just don't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I've been known to add them to my hosts file to make sure they get ignored.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's annoying is when I don't even have an ad blocker. I use ublock origin which blocks privacy invading scripts. Its not my problem that your ads a spyware and sometimes even malware

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, ublock origin is absolutely an ad blocker. It can and does do the basics of, "remove annoying DOM element".

Saying it's not an ad blocker is like saying a truck isn't a car (car as in vehicle) because it can tow things, too.

[–] joe_cool@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

First sentence in the description:

uBlock Origin is not an "ad blocker", it's a wide-spectrum content blocker with CPU and memory efficiency as a primary feature.

That like saying a road is for cars. When you can drive your truck and motorcycle on it. (to use your analogy) A road and uBlock can do other things than the one they do the most.

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Most of the time those articles are bullshit click bait anyway.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

"I'm not that interested"

[–] heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There is the legend of the adblock-block-blocker

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"This game you like got a good update" okay cool click
"Disable adblocker" okay thanks for the news; I'll just search for the official post on the game company's website.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

"Said update just resets all of your opt-outs and forces you to sign a new ToS"

[–] ngons@feddit.nu 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Happened to me about 4mins ago

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you started using the internet 5 minutes ago?

[–] ngons@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, that’s exactly what I meant

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you're using uBlock Origin, bring up the control panel and disable JavaScript for that webpage. Then reload the page. Works on most of these pages for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bdi89@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same with articles asking for sub fees. Nah.

load more comments (2 replies)

howtogeek started doing this. Really annoying when you have technical questions you need answered

[–] ares35@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

search and find a different source. there's usually multiple, especially for news (and "news") items.

click and drag over the headline, then do one of these:

  • copy/paste to the browser search box or address bar

  • click and drag the now-selected text to the search box or address bar

  • right click on the text and 'search for.....' from context menu

[–] panja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Serious question... What's the answer to paying for services like this? If everyone adblocks, how can they be sustainable? Will journalism just die because no one wants to pay or see ads?

[–] webhead@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They could try not putting so many ads you can't fucking read and making sure they don't contain malware. That'd be a start.

A lot of these things are due to the greed of the website owners stuffing as many ads as they possibly can into their sites.

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

for a while there was a service called Scroll for like $5 a month, you wouldn't see ads and your monthly payment would get divided between all the articles you viewed that month. they were partnered with Firefox and supposedly privacy friendly. they were bought by twitter and essentially killed.

edit: wikipedia

[–] Aasikki@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I'd happily subscribe to that. Even though I hate subscriptions, I hate ads way more.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a few trucks you can use to view the article.
You can view the cached version of the site.

You can get there by doing a search under Google and clicking on the ellipses to get to the cached version. Generally this version includes no ads or pop ups.

Alternatively you can inspect the element and delete the offending div/script. But this is more advanced and the results for cached are better in terms of readability.

But generally speaking it's usually best to avoid those dumpster fire websites.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a few trucks you can use to view the article.

Toyota trucks are the most efficient for driving to the people responsible for putting ads on your article and convincing them to change their minds.

[–] tslnox@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Google "fuck fuck Adblock" (yes, fuck twice)

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TotalTrash@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And ya'll need to stop using chrome.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the 90s, I started closing any page that had an ad because I had principles. I still close pages that won't let me read with an ad-blocker, but holy shit.

[–] BallsInTheShredder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very early nineties: no ads Mid late nineties: many ads Early 2000's: ad blockers become prevalent 2023: now receive an ad telling us to disable ad blocker so we can view more ads.

We've come full circle. I remember when logging onto the internet was a way to escape the ads that plagued cable and satellite.. now there are more..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›