stewie3128

joined 1 year ago
[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

By the time they get their shit together, Russia is going to own the Donbas (source of neon and wheat, both of which China needs), and then China will own Taiwan.

TSMC better hurry up if they want to complete this while they're still a company.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

And that was before Pelosi made AOC fire her most visibly leftist staffers.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

Communism is better than nothing, but it's going to have to be a global communism to make a difference, since any one of us on the planet can clearly consume 5x+++ their share of resources annually.

Even if we got 75% of the world population with the program, we could still have a consumption problem 5x that of America, because the greatest consumers will be the last to join the revolution.

Climate Stalin is the only thing that might, might improve the situation we're going to find ourselves in. Other than that, we're just going to pollute ourselves and everyone else to extinction, hence my belief that all non-human flora and fauna would be better off without us.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

He is a dipshit, but there is also precedence for people cropping themselves to get on the dole:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernon%2C_Florida?wprov=sfla1

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

And you are going to magically manage energy demand through gentle suggestion?

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

Coffee tastes bad, coke zero is great first thing in the morning, and egg nog is better without any alcohol in it.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Humans need to go extinct for the good of every non-human on the planet. We're never going to get a critical mass of people worldwide on the right page to continue increasing our population without wrecking everything.

Live long and die out.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

We have cameras to see if the mail has come yet, which of us moved the big broom, check in on things while we're out of town, etc. They can be useful even if you're not in a risky neighborhood.

ETA: We have no firearms, because we don't have any interest in maintaining the proficiency necessary to ensure that we don't accidentally kill each other. Even aside from that, we have no interest in hunting, and the likelihood that a gun would ever make a positive difference during some remotely-possible home invasion is basically unmeasurable.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is why I don't read Nextdoor anymore. I live in a boring, safe suburban neighborhood, and all I read on there were people freaking out about nothing, propagandizing themselves and each other. Fascist hellscape, Nextdoor is.

[–] stewie3128@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

The Psychologists in my family only refer to Myers-Briggs in an anecdote from grad school: it was used as the ideal example of how to design a terrible test.

They say that, if you're going to do a personality test, long-form MMPI is the best of them, but personality tests are just academic exercises that don't tell the therapist as much as they could learn by just talking to the patient.

view more: next ›