Movies & TV

22879 readers

51 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

WhyEssEff@hexbear.net

Zoift@hexbear.net

Jadzia_Dax@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

Walk_On@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Grebgreb@hexbear.net

ultraviolet@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

Sulvor@hexbear.net

The Wrath of Khan at home. (hexbear.net)

submitted 6 days ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GenXen@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, Cumberbatch is NOT Khan!

I repeat again, Cumberbatch is not playing Khan!!.

I bet you didn't see my huge twist! Don't spoil it!!

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The original Khan and Kirk had history from the series that worked into the movie, while the remakes... don't. Why name him Khan if you are missing the whole backstory?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 days ago

The name sold tickets is why.