this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8245 readers
453 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
the NYPD already put out photos of a guy who CLEARLY wasn't the guy, different jacket different hood different backpack
The NYPD claims to already have DNA evidence and if that's the case I have to assume they have no idea who it belongs to or can't 100% link it to the assassinatoon, otherwise they would have put a name out already.
They have no idea.
Lmao where would they have gotten the shooter's DNA from? What a ridiculous claim to make
they say a water bottle and candy wrapper
I'm guessing it's smoke but who knows
The guy went in an alley and they found those things in the alley, right?
Essentially they are saying they found litter in a New York alleyway.
Based on the DNA found on the water bottle and candy wrapper, the shooter was a giant rat, apparently
theres no way he was eating candy and drinking water in the five minutes he was standing there and just dumped the trash
I think they claimed to have recovered it from the Starbucks but I really don't remember clearly
lmao i mean i guess if they had the name they gave the nurse and found the cup, they could??? but from what i read he used cash at starbucks and could have just said any name
Not to mention cops hate it when expert witnesses testify on DNA evidence because turns out real life is not CSI: Miami and DNA evidence is not really conclusive at all.
So them having DNA, even if true, means diddly squat.
I don't know, those photos are still up and everywhere. If that's somebody else, wouldn't they have found out by now and made some sort of effort to clear their name to not get got?
those photos are still really low quality, I know like 2 people that could be the guy