this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
82 points (97.7% liked)

Slop.

321 readers
594 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
82
time is a flat circle (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by LemmySlopSkimmer@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

90% of online leftism is plauged by the fear of coherent tactics or strategy.

Yes, we will (critically) support any means to enable the ends we want.

And yes, that involves teaming up with unsavoury characters at times

It involves with dealing with the messy transition to socialism (which is not a pure ideal that can be implemented simply because "I wanna")

And most importantly, it involves using violence to defend revolutionary gains.

I would much rather we win the climate wars rather than die to roving bands of fascists militants/states looking to hunt minorities.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, we will (critically) support any means to justify the ends we want.

I won't support, even critically, any means to justify the end we want. I will support some means and make a moral balance, but I won't support just any means

And most importantly, it involves using violence to defend revolutionary gains.

To me, more than "using violence to defend revolutionary gains", it's being aware that the ones in power right now in class war aren't afraid of using such violence, and we need to defend ourselves, sometimes preemptively, from such violence.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I won’t support, even critically, any means to justify the end we want. I will support some means and make a moral balance, but I won’t support just any means

In practice I'd keep some things off the table as well, but our attitude should reflect the seriousness of the situation we are facing. Possibly hundreds of millions of people are going to die needless deaths in the coming decades.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

Balkan Odyssey has a video on the death toll of capitalism and the number is on the hundreds of millions already. I'm just saying that there are some means I won't support, without needing to specify which or why I guess. Morality is a grey thing