this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
77 points (98.7% liked)

Movies & TV

23402 readers
68 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every paragraph is just chefs-kiss

Bees, for those unschooled in entomology, are broken into three subsets: "Workers," who build the hive, prepare the honey, and clean each other; "Queens," who eat the honey and live in opulence; and "Wasps," who fight wars at the queen's behest and defend the hive from bears. If this sounds vaguely familiar, it should. It is nearly identical to the social structure that we as humans employ.

See how the worker bee corresponds fluidly to the human laborer. The queen, by contrast, could be mistaken for a member of our ruling class: Presidents, CEOs, publishers. The wasp is analogous to a soldier or boxer. Bears, in this case, can stand in for themselves, as they pose a grave threat to both species.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] axont@hexbear.net 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it only existed to show how detached and malleable the innies are. Outside people easily see the book as pretentious gibberish. Innies see it as the most profound words they've ever read.

[–] driving_crooner 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I'm talking about the rewrite of the book by the writer guy and the Corp lady. The last scene of the plot line was him and his wife fighting because she couldn't believe he was selling off to Lumon, but after that the book was never mentioned again.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

spoilerI think the book's purpose was to wake up the innies and give them the drive to find their "true selves" and rebel.

The part about him selling off to Lumon was to show 1) Lumon was working behind the scenes on damage control to ensure nothing like them breaking out ever happens again 2) show that the wise theorists behind inspiring works are also humans who can easily be corrupted against their stated values.

It did seem like they could have extended that subplot a bit by how they were setting it up but it also served its purposes

[–] miz@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

~~just saw this after making my comment, I'm pretty sure that happens later in the season, I'll go back and check now~~

it's from S02E03 at 34 minutes, you're right

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought the stuff they read during the ORTBO was what Ricken wrote

[–] CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I could tell it was the same TV writers but the voicing was very different, a lot less pompous pseudo-academic and more like scripture. It was Kier's diary, right?

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think the text is written from Keir’s perspective but I just assumed that was a literary framing device that Natalie suggested when they were discussing how to make the book more suitable for innies.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I just thought they would pick that back up in season 3