Would be really helpful if explained in Marxist terms, especially whether first world capital/superprofits are diverted to Israel in amounts not earned by providing services to power, or having Israel around is unprofitable/counterproductive to US aims/interests. Do other countries experience the same?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I think Israel is better understood as an extension of the US. Israel's policy is US policy, they are one.

[–] leftAF@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's easier to not think of nations because what we're trying to identify might be better understood as "neoconservatives", it's a faction of the ruling class that was aligned with the late Sheldon Adelson but his widow continues the legacy seemingly as well as Bibi, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) gang.

We have clear as day examples where Israel decides US troop movement in support of redirecting stolen oil to them during the Iraq War - as happened with CENTCOM's Energy Infrastructure Planning Group deferring to IDF/Mossad agent Michael Makovsky as often as they did, which Gary Vogler has written much about. It's a little bit murkier but Kurds get roped into similar shit too, all the time.

[–] Fingernail2@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

The neoconservatives control the US via Israel, which can go so far as to dictate troops movements to its exclusive benefit?

load more comments (4 replies)