this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
186 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7760 readers
2 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is no baby here, only bathwater

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, please tell me the problems you have with the political compass disregarding the website and questions. If it's so flawed, you should easily be able to point them out right?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I already have told you. Political economy is one thing not two separate axis. Promoting the opposite is promoting political illiteracy, which is the "tools" whole point. Its not educating its obfuscating.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd say your obfuscating by conflating politics and economics. Sure they are closely related and thus the X,Y graph, but they are not the same. Neither of us is the arbiter of truth so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree here.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say your obfuscating by conflating politics and economics

You could say that, but only because you've fundamentally bought in to a right wing framing through belief a right wing propaganda tool.

Neither of us is the arbiter of truth

Ok? Thats a complete thought terminating cliche. No one has to be the sole arbiter of truth to say things that are true about our material reality.

I didn't invent the concept of political economy. If you think its obfuscation, take it up with the political theorists of the 17th and 18th centuries and the socialist theorists of the 19th who drew on their work.

I'm not inventing things and arbiting truth, im talking about actual theory and not propaganda models, that have clearly worked in your case.

Sure they are closely related and thus the X,Y graph, but they are not the same

This is the problem with the political compass, and its entire reason for existing. Its to decouple politics from economics and create a belief that some things are similar or related when they are not - a flattening of political understanding to render people illiterate.

The use of "authoritarianism" as an axis - a word that is not meaningfully definable - is only used to perpetuate the Cold War mythologies of communists being the same as nazis. Just like double genocide theory, this view of politics is ultimately nazi apologia.

On the reverse, it serves to legitimize "right libertarianism" by flattening peoples understanding to make it look like it has something in common with actual ideological traditions like anarchism. As a professed anarchist, you should abhor this flattening and equivocation and the model that promotes it. I'm not personally an anarchist, but i find it disgusting how they've sought legitimacy by trying to tie themselves to actual intellectual and political tendencies.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair argument, I disagree. Tools are for measuring things, disagreeing with something doesn't mean it shouldn't be learned about, measured, and viewed in context. If you have a better tool that contains virtually all positions without simply leaving out those you disagree with please show me.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I don't use any tool. Politics is not a grid or a spectrum, and there is no point forcing one on it, unless you want to increase political illiteracy.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit has completely broken your brain.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Rad fash has completely broken yours. "Your rich powerful guy is evil, mine is righteous and we should kill you all if you don't fall in line behind my guy" is what your ideology boils down to.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Your rich powerful guy is evil, mine is righteous and we should kill you all if you don't fall in line behind my guy" is what your ideology boils down to.

When you totally understand Marxism-Leninism.

This is exactly what the political compass does to your brain

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

'Red fash' isnt a thing you fucking baby, read a fucking book

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

"Your rich powerful guy is evil, mine is righteous and we should kill you all if you don't fall in line behind my guy" is what your ideology boils down to.

We aren't the ones who support every NATO invasion and bombing campaign

[–] Flinch@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just wanna say, youre my favorite lemmitor around these parts, keep up the amazing posts mao-wave

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

They got ban-hammer -ed. I'll miss their work.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

obfuscating by conflating politics and economics

How do you type this out without spotting the obvious absurdity, just what do you think the point of politics is?

There can be no conflation because politics and economics are inseparable, like how hardware and software are inseparable components of computerization

Every civilization has a mode of production that allows said civilization to reproduce itself, and that reproduction is implemented as a matter of political will shaped thru the realities of whatever specific mode defines the civilization, it's not a "close relationship" that may or may not interact depending on some vacuum context, instead politics and economics are literal embodiments of each other that always interact in the physical world humans inhabit

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what do you think the point of politics is?

Power

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, but power to do what?

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Explain how you can affeft social issues without affecting class dynamics. Explain how you can affect class dynamics without affecting social issues.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Explain why you think class dynamics --> social issues is a one-way street. Change can and does flow both ways.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm literally saying they're interconnected systems, youre the one claiming economics and politics are seperable. Marxism is literally political economy, we don't think they can be meaningfully separated.