this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
195 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13535 readers
963 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If she has degrees in communication & acting, that is to say (no judgement implied ofc) that she is a trained liar, and you really shouldn't believe anything she says.
This is in fact her jobs pitch, because she wants to work in the media, she did not in fact hand out resumes to minimum wage jobs and has no intention of working one, probably everything in the article is false these kind of 'experience/perspective' pieces usually are.
edit: perhaps 'storyteller' is a more polite way of saying it. But aside from that ("I'm a story teller & have always wanted to be one, in fact I studied how to tell storys and give performences, now let me tell you a true story about my experience - I even cry") the fact its reported in Business Insider, Fortune dot com, Daily Mail, should really tell you its wholesale fabrication.
Newspapers don't generally run pieces featuring anyone below the kind of 'minor gentry' class in a sympathetic light like this. They do run pieces (often fabricated) from people of their own class who are supposed to create a relatable crafted narrative for the lower orders.
I'm not sure it is, anecdotes (testimony) can be useful if true, and statistics can be employed to tell lies about data just as well. Also, media has always done this, since mass media came about.
I mean, its just fabricated - not a highly personal example, but rather no example at all. Therefore, any narrative is also false.
But it does align with predetermined notions (themes) for various audiences (like any story) I agree.
Every account I've seen from anybody who has been featured in a news story has said that the truth was ignored, and the media misrepresented what happened, embellished, ommitted, lied etc. Of course in this case, the lies are already told by the 'social media personality', to further her own career - to sell her performances, to an prospective audience but also to prospective employers. So its more of a two-way relationship.