this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13533 readers
903 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (25 children)

Those other commenters have accepted a premise baked into your comment that I do not. Why can't a public role model also be a model on OnlyFans? The only reason you would think that those two things are incompatible is if you think that there is something morally wrong with one of them, which I don't believe holds water. There is no form of sex work that I believe disqualifies someone from being a role model, and therefore a teacher, a parent, a counselor, or anything else.

[–] Carguacountii@hexbear.net 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (17 children)

Its not so much whether sex work is or isn't immoral, or unethical, I'd consider that a separate discussion, but rather how that practice relates to children and their education and development. Something can be ok for adults to learn about or engage in but not for children.

As an example, its usually seen as not a good thing for children to learn about being a soldier (even if it happens in practice), despite it being a very good way of making soldiers, to teach them young. But the resulting harm to those children and society makes it generally outlawed, and certainly against public opinion. This is seperate and distinct from an argument about whether its good or bad, right or wrong for an adult to learn about being a soldier. The same applies to drug use - you need to be wiser and better educated than a child to engage with it, because of the risks and harms involved.

edit; to further clarify, with the soldier analogy, you might be ok with it being taught in a structured and carefully thought out way, but not for children to be watching war footage, if you see what I mean.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago (6 children)

how do you feel about military recruiters in highschools?

how do you feel about traumatized war criminals becoming teachers?

[–] Carguacountii@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't feel good about it at all, and I think it should be banned! The presence of one bad thing doesn't make other bad things ok, though.

We are our experiences, our environments, and with children they're in a stage where learning lots is more important than learning or experiencing critically, and they don't have much wisdom or experience to be properly judgemental or to contextualise or understand what they see or hear, so we have to treat them differently. Development is also a process over time, so we need to make sure the learning content is appropriate for the age or developmental stage (including social development), and also not all taught at once but rather gradually, depending on their current capacity.

I'm unsure why you'd think its a necessary question to ask, given the comment you've responded to, but I hope you're satisfied with the answer.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

just checking how thorough your brainworms are

if

The presence of one bad thing doesn't make other bad things ok, though.

is referring back to teachers with OF accounts then you need some more fumigating

[–] Carguacountii@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

could you explain why, I feel that I've explained my position in various comments (but I can reiterate if you'd like) and I'd like to know why you think it means my brain is wormy?

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

other people have already explained it to you.

the thing you're worried about is a bullshit moral panic and you fucking need to get over it.

[–] Carguacountii@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well I disagree with what they've said, and I don't think they've explained it at all, rather just accused me of being a puritan or similar. Could you try, in your own words?

I think the claims that have been made by others against me or my position that weren't simply lazy smears, I've already refuted (that what a teacher does publically is no business of the public, and that because military teachers/recruiters are allowed in schools so too should this, that there is any relation to trans people or drag queens to this issue, that teachers being fired for being pornographers means sex work is consequentially immoral). I certainly don't feel that anyone's said anything in contradiction that's caused me to even consider that my stance might be incorrect, but I'm willing to consider a reasonable and good response - I don't want to have brain worms after all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)