this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
42 points (74.4% liked)

games

20523 readers
444 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I should have known better, as the whole cowboy genre is terrible as fuck. Westerns (as boomer Americans call the genre) have the slowest dialogue, the corniest patriarchal story-line, and are obviously filled with a heap ton of other problematic bits. Of course, I had to try as the game got great reviews. I thought I'd try it with the Steam summer sale.

Fuckkkkkkkk the long boring ass cut scenes. OMG pls talk faster and have dialogue that's interesting. The beginning of the game is just 30 minutes of video and riding your horse so slowly through the snow. I thought that my TikTok brain couldn't stand some old slow game from a bygone era, but I'm checking this shit and it was released in 2018!

If I was some prat who loved the mythology of the "settling of the west", a game with a white dude on a horse on a mountain would get me hard. Why can't more games be like Atomic Heart? I wanna defend the land of Stalin and have cut scenes with ~~good dialogue~~ a talking glove that debates theory and a sexy refrigerator that probably wants to murder me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stolen_Stolen_Valor@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Does the debtor thing change over the game? I remember that incident early on being what gets him really thinking about who he is.

Major spoilers for RDR2.

spoilerThe entirety of the debtor storyline pretty much sums up Arthur’s entire character arc. He loathes working for ~~Muller~~ Strauss in the (first?) collection mission he contracts the illness that eventually wakes him the fuck up. Over the course of the game when you accept missions from Muller, Arthur snipes at him over the nature of his work and grouses about having to be his attack dog. When he finds out he is dying, he starts wrestling with his mortality and with it his morality. This culminates with him giving ~~Muller~~ Strauss the boot from the camp. (Or I think outright killing him? It might be a decision I can’t remember.)

My biggest criticism of the games writing is it saying “Arthur doing these shakedowns is the thing that literally kills him” It’s a bit too on the nose but overall the writing is great.

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sorry if I don't get involved in this discussion as I don't know the game enough. I just think that it's cool that you two are really hashing this out.

[–] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This discussion shows one of the main reasons why it's such a good game though. It has a depth that very few other games have achieved, not just in terms of the world and lore, but as a genuinely human kind of story that also manages not to turn all its social commentary into tepid, lib-friendly clichés.

However I don't know why people in this thread keep calling the loan shark character "Muller." His name is Strauss.

[–] Stolen_Stolen_Valor@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah that’s on me.

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My biggest criticism of the games writing is it saying “Arthur doing these shakedowns is the thing that literally kills him” It’s a bit too on the nose but overall the writing is great.

There is literally nothing wrong with this? What exactly is the criticism?

[–] Stolen_Stolen_Valor@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Its a minor criticism, but my issue with it is it’s not subtle. Like working for a debtor was obviously killing Arthur spiritually and metaphorically, making it also literally killing him seemed unnecessary.

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh I get you, but I don’t think that was because they couldn’t be subtle, that was because it was a prequel and there is absolutely no mention of Arther in the first game, so he kinda has to die.

[–] Stolen_Stolen_Valor@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh no I agree he has to die, the story is a tragedy, just the manner of his death in this way was a little silly.

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

Agree to disagree. But I would like to hear an alternative if you have one.

[–] take_five_seconds@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

spoilerhe doesn't kill him he basically runs him out the camp with a "GO ON GIT!" kinda thing

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago

spoilerI don't think you can kill him you just get the option to run him out of camp eventually