this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

games

20527 readers
238 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RussianEngineer@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

just license everything under GPLv3 and call it a day, gosh. any other license is just liberalism (unless someone knows a better one)

[–] edge@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No commercial use can be pretty valid. You might not want some big company using your software.

(Not that that applies so much to a PS1 emulator.)

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apparently some companies were modifying and packaging Duckstation in commercial products without contributing their changes back into the project which seems to be what ticked him off this time

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's kinda the point of FOSS - that free to use means free to use.

That being said, the only times I see the downsides of this policy is when downstream messes with software on a permissive license, then doesn't support users when the stuff they messed with fucks up - Usually Linux distros rebuilding software to use fucked up dependencies.

[–] git@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Duckstation was licensed under GPLv3, which requires that not only downstream changes are shared upon request, but everything used to build that source too.

Arcade1UP refused to share changes they made to support some Simpsons arcade cabinet they were selling. They eventually shared the changes after being pressured, but even then the sources they shared weren’t in any decent or buildable state. Some additional context: https://old.reddit.com/r/Arcade1Up/comments/10osxo0/john_d_states_arcade1up_is_not_in_violation_of/

If I was maintaining a project the size of Duckstation I’d consider this my last straw too. He’s cleared the license change with all contributors so it’s his call to make.

Ultimately if the license is a sticking point the community can fork from the last known GPLv3 commit and continue work from there. Using Swanstation is also an option as that was forked a while ago.

Emulators come and go all the time, this is no different.

[–] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the context

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah I get the frustration the GPL can make, especially how it doesn't require downstream to provide source in a coherent format. The GPL is a pain in the ass to manage, even if I'm a fan of it ideologically