Take "I love shrimp salad" but replace "love" with "am", replace "shrimp" with "Adolf" and "salad" with "Hitler"
Psychological horror movie about someone going to a party of only white cishet men in their 30's
Gun rights is "whoever can buy them" rights aka usually not minorities
What's grinding my gears is the number of indefinitely more useful shit you could buy with 1000$
Yes Donny this problem requires a boots on ground approach, please go ruin more diplomatic and economic relationships for us now thank you
Literally the opposite
I think you're mostly right, there's just a nuance between the "class reductionism" which is wrong because it means disregarding other struggles entirely and "historical materialism reduces History to class struggle" which shouldn't be read as an insult to Marxist science
Thing is, we got to find an effective way of encompassing History to analyse it or we're going to get lost in so many details it will lead to stagnation, it's okay to use reduction in that case, it's on board with the philosophy of action and change that characterize Marxism
For example, it's not wrong to say "Marxism doesn't account for how psychology affects History" but it's also totally liberal wanking because we won't achieve anything by psychoanalyzing every goddamn person in the world because taking any action
My point is, reductionism isn't technically bad, it's bad when you use it wrong
The term that comes to mind would be "reductionism" but it's not really a fallacy, it's more of a path of least resistance. Marxism could be accused of reductionism because everything is seen through the lens of class struggle. And tbh, fair enough, if you successfully understand the fundamental structure of something you can absolutely "reduce" everything to that and get a lot of things right.
However in the example you mentioned, the bigot is denying the complexity and agency of a person. It's not about arguments anymore, because somebody is actively dehumanising somebody else and they found one weak point to justify it all. In this case they're no debate to be had, either you can remind the bigot they are talking about someone with consciousness and agency or you tell them to fuck off and leave them in their sad little hateful life
Some bits make me think the author is liberal-adjacent. There's the notion of "universalism" which is a pillar of french liberal thought, and the way they phrase the notion of rejecting western liberalism, making it sound like western liberalism is an engine for social progress in itself and should be preserved
L'Académie Française are a bunch of senile royalists and every media "left" and right are gobbling their reactionary insanity
The three-armed soldier on the middle panel really shows how much they care about their craft as AI artists lol
lil_tank
0 post score0 comment score
So you mean "moderate drinker" works the same as "moderate right"