this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
163 points (98.2% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2495 readers
2555 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

Was this before, or after he called a former commander of the ISS "fully retarded?"

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 2 points 22 hours ago

The Apartheid Manchild has this weird obsession with Mars.

There will be no permanent settlement on Mars in the next decade. (I frankly doubt that there will even have been human footprints on Mars in the next decade!) There will be no permanent settlement on Mars in the next century. There will likely be no permanent settlement on Mars in the next millennium. And I'm saying that last one not because I don't think we'd have the technology in a thousand years, but rather because there is no point in living on Mars.

Mars has nothing we need that's worth maintaining a settlement in the face of conditions harsher than the absolute worst the Earth has to offer. If people want to live in a permanently cold shithole with nothing usefully accessible they can just build a house on Antarctica. It's a far cheaper way to fuck around and find otu.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (2 children)

FYI the plan was the deorbit it in 2030.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently, Elon wants that sooner rather than later.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You gotta wonder if today's fight with the previous commander of the ISS had anything to do with it.

It would be the most petty, dumb, and childish thing to call for the de-obiting of the ISS over a tweet, but my expectations for him get lower each day.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, so Elon offered a nonsensical rescue plan for publicity reasons and is upset that it was turned down?

Funny. Just like when these people were stuck in that cave in Thailand and Elon offered a nonsensical rescue plan for publicity reasons and was upset that it was turned down.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

This is the Thai cave rescue all over again.

So far he hasn't accused anyone of being a pedophile yet, so Yei?

[–] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 38 points 2 days ago

Musk is such a miserable pile of trash that it's insulting he even has a 1/100th the influence he has

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tell me they're gonna use it as a staging point for the new station parts and build it remotely from here instead of launching everything up there from fresh after abandoning their foothold

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

that’s exactly what they’re not going to do

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where would they get the materials, machines, and tools needed to build a space station on the ISS?

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Send in bucket.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We should deorbit him instead.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I disagree. We should orbit him.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

Well yeah, that way you can deorbit him

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Reaching escape velocity is expensive. We can be more efficient and still achieve the same result using a minuscule fraction of the propellant and none of the rocket framing.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Efficiency. That's his thing. Let's make sure it's efficient.

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A guillotine doesn’t require any fuel

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FALSE!

The blade is pulled up by human work, muscles are fueled by food.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I volunteer as tribute

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

A trebuchet will achieve the same result and require none of the rocket framing.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean we're already sending rockets up there. I'm sure we can afford to dump him out on the way.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MelodiousFunk does have a point. Shooting him is cheaper.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, but that's not ironic enough for me.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Just hogtie him and leave him on the lauch pad. We get rid of a problem, and the problem is turned into mostly it's component atoms. Give giving the circle of life a little help!

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trebuchet? Cheap? ✅. Easily assembled and transported? ✅. Low tech not needed any rare earth materials? ✅. Sufficient to launch him at least 150 m? ✅. Low survivability rate for potential additional yeeting? ✅.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Hmm, I think we shouldn't rule out other simple machines with wooden frames and French names just yet.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

To be clear, I am not advocating for shooting Musk. I am saying we can ignite a fraction of the rocket fuel without any of the containment vessels or expensive infrastructure. While there will be no liftoff, it would certainly be uplifting.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Let's go to Mars"

Imagine living some place where you have to pay Musk for your air and water.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The book A City On Mars is a great read about why everything Mars settlement enthusiasts want to do is a bad idea, and yes it covers the problem of a private company controlling your air supply.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[the Expense series has entered the chat]

Oya beltaloada!

Lotta fellota in here...

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

New Bioshock sequel coming up?

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

most likely because he wants to launch his own and charge america through the nose

[–] nilo@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why wouldn’t he? Now even more money can flow towards spacex’s not-gonna-happen goal of going to Mars.

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

Simpsons did it first! In an episode the rich and smart were sent on a ship as the earth is ending. Thought the smart folks will just be replaced by AI at this point. Once it becomes a reliable repository for knowledge - meaning no 'need' for ~~fart smellas~~ smart fellas.

The conclusion of such an approach is even broached by Wall-E, disney of all folks.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Put him on it first, then let it drop

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago

Elon Musk is also an idiot so why should we be listening to him? He already sees business opportunity for his bullshit SpaceX or some shit.

[–] eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lemmy user (me) recommends Elon Musk to be fired into the Sun ASAP

[–] teft@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Cheaper to shoot him into interstellar space. Less Δv needed that way.

[–] eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I dunno, what if in a couple million years some alien civilization finds what's left of him and resurrects or clones his brain? I don't know if we should take that risk..

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

[the Three Body Problem series has entered the chat]

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If price is the issue please send me the gofundme link

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Good thing he doesn't have a conflict of interest... oh wait.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remember the 4chan post about a crack in the ISS.

Accelerationist pepperidge farms remembers..

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 9 points 2 days ago

I think that's probably the instigating factor. He saw on Twitter that the ISS has a big crack and the government is covering it up, he decided it's true because in his mind trolls on the internet have a higher level of authority than any expert or scientist, and now he has to insist on deorbiting it to prove himself right instead of backing down or listening to any reason to the contrary.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)