this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
707 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

9209 readers
1711 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 102 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I want to take it one step further.

And no, I don't care if there's good reason to believe that Tyrannosaurs weren't fluffy like owls, I still want a decent artist's depiction of a T. rex with owl-level fluff.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 108 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A giant murder sparrow would be horrifying as fuck, ngl.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Horrifying AND cuddly.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Anyone who thinks feathered dinosaurs are somehow less terrifying need to be locked in a room with a cassowary

Or a secretary bird

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Came for this, not disappointed

[–] MelonYellow@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

They might’ve really had feathers! It’s funny how Jurassic Park colors our perception

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 60 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Artist's depiction =|= AI slop

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yay

I should warn you my wedding dress will have spiked shoulderpads with Warhammer style spikes

[–] ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

ill_allow_it.gif

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Feathered tyrannosaur of Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yutyrannus

Feathered tyrannosaur of North America: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanuqsaurus

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hippos will absolutely fuck you up, though.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah pic 2 is just an artistic depiction of their inner selves

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Inside all of us there are two hippos...

[–] Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey, that's not fair, I've really been trying to lose weight.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And it shows! You look like just 1.8 hippos now!

[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Take your upvote

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

It’s like that is the hippo’s Slayer form from Baldur’s Gate 2.

But they have a Bruce-Banner-esque secret… they are always the Slayer.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago

Fun fact, the reason some dinosaurs are depicted with lips is because the asymetrical wear on their teeth doesn't match with modern equivalent's that have exposed teeth, meaning they had "labial scale" lips.

Image owned by Mark P. Witton

[–] Houseman@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hippos are so friend shaped it's unfair.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] elvith@feddit.org 69 points 2 weeks ago

IT'S A TRAP! chomp

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The reason for the stretched skin look for dinosaurs initially is because of the comparison to lizards, who do frequently have their skin stretched on their bones except in a few places. Unfortunately things like that have momentum, so changing it takes even longer than it took to catch on.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm still pissed at Jurassic World cowardly going with the old designs when they could have shown the current knowledge, much like the original movie has.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't watched Jurassic World, but wasn't that kinda explained with the frog DNA? I heard something to that effect. Meaning that they knew they weren't like the original animals.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

yes, henry wu even says something along the lines of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, in universe it fits the continuity. They're not dinosaurs, they're lab created animals that fit an inaccurate public perception of dinosaurs . Corpos keep corping, why mess with a winning formula

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago

An interesting book on why many dinosaur depictions are wrong and what they may have looked like.
The hippos teeth peg it as a mostly vegetation, so depictions would favor that line.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy shit, this is exactly this book:

All Yesterdays: Unique and Speculative Views of Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals

There was a great podcast that pointed me to it: https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/welcome-to-jurassic-art-redux/transcript/

I think that's it. I've already done more searching than I intended to get the name of the book. You're on your own.

I wanted to be an archeologist when I was a kid because I loved dinos. This book speaks to me.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To whoever likes this sort of fantastical speculative artistry, one of the authors C.M. Koseman also wrote and illustrated All Tomorrow's, which is a similarly speculative view of humanity from the fictional perspective of a paleontologist in the unfathomably far future, after humanity spread to the stars and experienced an apocalypse that leads us down countless evolutionary paths. Content warning: Body horror, cosmic horror, but presented in an academic way.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

I wish I was one of the snake people. Look at him. He is at peace with his Sock and Juice.

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The term "artist" here is being used kind of loosely. They're doing the bare minimum you need to turn a skeleton into a living creature. Good artistic representations require a lot more imagination, beyond what we scientifically know. You can get clues by looking at already existing animals and how they relate to their skeletons. Which gives an idea of how much not bone material those creatures might have. No you won't know exactly how much they did, but that's not really being represented by skin wrapping either is it. Better to try and go for something believable rather than the bare minimum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Does that hippo have a beard?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

It has a badly shaven mustache, so the beard is likely

load more comments
view more: next ›